Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It has been the theory for some time that the symptoms associated with
decompression or pressure-drop sickness may be due to the formation of
gas bubbles (air embolism) in the blood vessels of the brain or in the
regions of the joints or in the blood vessels of the lungs. When the
bubbles collect in the blood vessels of the brain, they are supposed to
cause a physical or mental disturbance or paralysis. When the gas
bubbles collect in the region of the joints, they are supposed to cause
pain in the region of the joints. When the bubbles collect in the blood
vessels in the lungs, they are supposed to cause the chokes or attacks
of coughing. That has been a theory that has been held for some 15 or 20
years, and an expert in the field of aviation medicine could not have
been unaware of it. (_Tr. pp. 9098-9._) Since Rascher had observed
bubbles as is described in his report of 11 May 1942, and since Ruff and
Romberg had complete knowledge of the deaths, obviously these important
findings of Rascher on air embolism did not escape the attention of Ruff
and Romberg. It can only be concluded that these findings, which
resulted from intentioned deaths, form the basis of the paragraph quoted
above from the final report. Because of the nature of the subject
matter, and a prior knowledge of the observations in the autopsies in
the experiments, the ideas expressed in the paragraph quoted above
cannot be separated from those in the Rascher report of 11 May. So
testified the expert witness Dr. A. C. Ivy. (_Tr. p. 9151._) All of this
proves again that the testimony of Ruff and Romberg to the effect they
had nothing to do with the so-called “Rascher experiments” is completely
false. Even though deaths are not specifically mentioned in the joint
report of 28 July, it is clear from Dr. Ivy’s testimony that the
findings in the death cases form the basis for a part of that report.
Ruff and Romberg would have the Tribunal believe that the experiments
were completed and the chamber removed from Dachau by 20 May 1942. Since
Romberg knew of and reported on the deaths to Ruff in April, there
clearly was no excuse whatever to leave the chamber in Dachau for even
another day. But according to their own story, it stayed until 20 May
and Romberg saw two more men killed. They attempted to gloss over their
criminal participation in these later murders by saying that the chamber
could not be moved without orders from the Luftwaffe Medical Inspector.
Be that as it may, such a technical violation of moving the chamber
without orders is hardly comparable to the crime of leaving the chamber
for further experiments by a man whom they admit they knew to have been
a murderer. Indeed, any decent superior who was not himself a party to
the crime, as they actually were, would undoubtedly have court-martialed
Ruff and Romberg for leaving the chamber there, not to speak of Rascher.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account