Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
These depositions by the witness Dr. Lutz conform in every respect with
the general impression received from all the pertinent descriptions. At
first, only the altitude experiments approved by Dr. Ruff regarding the
problem of “rescue from high altitudes” were carried out. These
experiments were not dangerous as proved by their successful outcome;
the inmates volunteered for them. Gradually, however, Rascher misused
more and more the presence of the chamber in order to conduct his
arbitrary experiments on Himmler’s orders for entirely different
problems, namely, to conduct his notorious “difficult experiments” which
had numerous fatal results. These were Rascher’s more cruel, painful
experiments; naturally, no more volunteers reported for these because
word was passed quickly through the camp that the experiments which
Rascher himself conducted were dangerous, while the mere presence and
cooperation of Dr. Romberg gave assurance to the inmates that his
experiments were conscientiously conducted and were not dangerous.
Other witnesses also, not named by Dr. Ruff, have confirmed that the
experimental subjects for the Ruff-Romberg high-altitude experiments
were voluntary, namely, the witness Dr. Hielscher (_German Tr. pp.
6025-26, 6041, 6062_). Testimony on similar lines is given by the
codefendant Sievers (_German Tr. pp. 5471, 5881_); and Dr. Hippke
(_German Tr. p. 793_) “Prisoners who might volunteer”; (_German Tr. p.
795_) “these persons had to volunteer for the experiments.” Also the
witness Karl Wolff, (_Ruff 21, Ruff Ex. 20_) “volunteer concentration
camp inmates who were to be given compensatory privileges * * * the
inmates, about 10 in number, appeared quite relaxed and, in their turn,
willingly entered the low-pressure chamber which had been driven up * *
* the inmates reported to Himmler, in my presence, that in this manner
they could at least voluntarily * * * give a proof of their genuine good
will * * * I never learned through Himmler, nor, as far as I remember,
by any other means that later low-pressure chamber experiments * * *
took place on a nonvoluntary basis * * * I only knew about voluntarily
low-pressure chamber experiments and these were made, without doubt, on
a voluntary basis.” Finally, the witness Herbert Wilschewske (_Ruff 11,
Ruff Ex. 9_).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account