Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The following proceeding shows the special care which was taken in the
carrying out of these experiments: It was agreed with the experimental
persons that in case of earache they were to point with the hand to the
ear. When one of the experimental subjects did this, Dr. Romberg
immediately altered the pressure conditions, and the behavior of the
experimental subject showed that he had no more discomfort. (_German Tr.
pp. 5743 and 6845._)
Since the question of the voluntary status of the human experimental
subjects may be of significance in the case of all experiments, a
comprehensive presentation of the most important depositions on this
subject is given here.
Himmler stated at the Easter conference in 1942, in answer to the
scruples of Sievers, that only volunteers were to be allowed to be drawn
upon for the experiments, and if the experiments were fraught with
danger to life then only major criminals under sentence of death and no
political prisoners would be taken. (_German Tr. p. 5677._) The witness
Neff testified that volunteers presented themselves for the experiments.
(_German Tr. p. 614._)
Dr. Craemer of the Mountain Institute for Psychology of the Army
Mountain Medical School [Gebirgspsychologisches, Institut der
Heeres-Gebirgs-Sanitaets-Schule] has, in an affidavit, reported a
conversation with Dr. Rascher in the course of which the latter said:
“Human experimental subjects. It is a question of major
criminals under valid sentence of death who come forward
voluntarily for the experiments in Dachau in order to have life
and liberty given to them if they survive an experiment.”
(_Handloser 37, Handloser Ex. 18._)
The witness Meine declared:
“* * * since, furthermore, I knew from the series of experiments
in Oranienburg that the prisoners had come forward voluntarily
in crowds * * * my suspicion was not aroused during these
years.” (_German Tr. p. 4864._)
Dr. Mrugowsky deposed the following in his direct examination regarding
yellow-fever experiments:
“Only volunteers were used, and Dr. Ding states in his
declaration (_NO-257, Pros. Ex. 283_) that he knew of a list,
and that for these kinds of cases always hundreds of volunteers
offered themselves because they would not need to work for 4
weeks and were better fed.” (_German Tr. p. 5195._)
Further, I refer to the affidavit of Dr. Morgen, which was submitted by
Dr. Mrugowsky’s defense counsel, Mrugowsky 32 (_Mrugowsky Exhibit 26_):
“At the conference with Dr. Ding I learned that the human
experimental subjects came forward voluntarily for these
experiments. * * * In the case of the prisoner whose treatment I
chanced to watch with others, I had the definite impression that
he was a volunteer.” (_German Tr. p. 5228._)
In connection with the high-altitude experiments in Dachau, I quote the
following from Dr. Ruff’s deposition:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account