Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The experiments from 12 to 15 km. altitude were made partly during
suspension in a parachute harness, partly in a sitting position, and
partly in a prone position. These experiments show that the body
attitude has a very essential influence on the tolerance for a high
degree of lack of oxygen. Since, besides this, every bodily exertion is
of great importance, in one portion of the experiments six knee bends
were made by the subject during the waiting period before beginning the
descent. These six knee bends consisted of three knee bends while
breathing oxygen followed by deep inhaling and holding of the breath,
and then three more knee bends without oxygen breathing. This procedure
was chosen in order not to neglect the bodily work involved in an actual
parachute jump. The descending experiments from 12 km. [39,400 ft.]
altitude yielded the following average times:
Table 1
Descending experiment │ Unconsciousness │Recovery of consciousness
from 12 km. [39,400 ft.] │ after— │ after—
│ │
Sitting without knee bends │1′39″ = 10.85 km. │6′38″ = 7.45 km.
│ [35,600 ft.]. │ [24,440 ft.].
Sitting after 6 knee bends │55″ = 11.4 km. │6′55″ = 7.25 km.
│ [37,400 ft.]. │ [23,786 ft.].
Suspended in parachute │37″ = 11.65 km. │7′40″ = 6.77 km.
harness │ │
│ [38,220 ft.]. │ [22,212 ft.].
│ │
It is to be noted in connection with the stated time and altitude values
that the beginning of unconsciousness, or of the recovery, was
calculated from the withdrawal of oxygen, while in most experiments the
sinking or free fall was begun at the expiration of the 10-second
waiting period. Since in addition to this the stages of altitude were
read off at the moment of unconsciousness, small variations from the
times given in figs. 2 and 3 [not reproduced] are possible
[page 8 of original]
since, especially in the falling experiments, variations occurred
because of the somewhat crude valve control. These variations, however,
are small and may be overlooked since in any case the fall and sinking
time under practical conditions are dependent on the flying attitude at
the moment of the leap from the catapult seat. In addition to this, the
calculated fall and sinking time are influenced to a high degree under
actual conditions by weight and air resistance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account