Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
In the Dachau concentration camp he was able to move without
restrictions and without control by accompanying guards. This was
impossible for occasional visitors like Sievers. (_German Tr. p. 5672_;
_German Tr. p. 5320_; _German Tr. pp. 6542-43_; _German Tr. p. 8620_;
_German Tr. pp. 8697 and 8887-88_; _Beiglboeck 31, Beiglboeck Ex. 12_.)
Holding the rank of a commanding general, the medical inspector of the
Luftwaffe deemed it advisable to assure SS Obergruppenfuehrer Wolff in
his letter of 6 March 1943 that he “would discuss the entire problem in
_old comradeship_ with Rascher personally.” (_NO-262, Pros. Ex. 108._)
A commanding general deemed it advisable to adopt this attitude,
contrary to all military customs, toward a staff physician because by
this conciliatory attitude, inconceivable under other circumstances, he
wanted to avoid a controversy with the latter on account of the latter’s
connections with Himmler.
What Rascher thought of Medical Inspector Dr. Hippke’s attitude is
revealed in the letter of 14 March 1943 to Dr. Rudolf Brandt in which he
states:
“I would like to point out the extraordinary amiability of the
inspector and his carefulness in all remarks relating to the
SS.” (_NO-270, Pros. Ex. 110._)
To make sure that Himmler would under all circumstances be informed
about Rascher’s conference with Medical Inspector Hippke, he continues:
“May I respectfully ask to inform, wherever that seems necessary
to you, the Reich Leader SS of my report.” (_NO-270, Pros. Ex.
110._)
The statement that Witness Dr. Punzengruber made about Rascher is very
characteristic:
“His (Rascher’s) connections were so strong that practically
every important superior trembled in fear of the intriguing
Rascher, who consequently held a position of enormous power.”
(_Sievers 44, Sievers Ex. 45._)
Rascher’s servility toward Himmler is already revealed by the bombastic
phrases with which he closes his letters to Himmler. To give a few
examples only:
Letter dated 17 February 1943, from Rascher to Himmler: “With
most obedient regards I remain in honest gratitude with Heil
Hitler your very devoted S. Rascher.” (_1616-PS, Pros. Ex.
105._)
Letter, dated 11 April 1943, from Rascher to Himmler: “With most
obedient regards and Heil Hitler I remain always, devoted to you
in gratitude, your S. Rascher.” (_NO-240, Pros. Ex. 112._)
Letter, dated 10 September 1942, from Rascher to Himmler: “In
grateful admiration with Heil Hitler your very devoted S.
Rascher.” (_NO-234, Pros. Ex. 83._)
The picture of Rascher is completed by the testimony that personally he
went to the highest authorities only. (_German Tr. p. 7966._)
Sievers is also brought into connection with Dr. Rascher’s attempt to
establish himself as a university lecturer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account