Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Protesting the lawless slaughter which even Himmler sought to
“camouflage”, the Bishop of Limburg in 1941 foresaw that such insane
carnage spelled the downfall of the Third Reich. (_615-PS._) He wrote:
“And if anybody says that Germany cannot win the war, if there
is yet a just God, these expressions are not the result of lack
of love for the Fatherland but of a deep concern for our people.
* * * High authority as a moral concept has suffered a severe
shock as a result of these happenings.”
SUMMARY
I have outlined the particular charges against the defendants under
count two, three, and four of the indictment; and I have sketched the
general nature of the evidence which we will present. But we must not
overlook that the medical experiments were not an assortment of
unrelated crimes. On the contrary, they constituted a well-integrated
criminal program in which the defendants planned and collaborated among
themselves and with others.
We have here, in other words, a conspiracy and a common design, as is
charged in count one of the indictment, to commit the criminal
experiments set forth in paragraphs 6 and 11 thereof. There was a common
design to discover, or improve, various medical techniques. There was a
common design to utilize for this purpose the unusual resources which
the defendants had at their disposal, consisting of numberless
unfortunate victims of Nazi conquest and Nazi ideology. The defendants
conspired and agreed together to utilize these human resources for
nefarious and murderous purposes, and proceeded to put their criminal
design into execution. Numbered among the countless victims of the
conspiracy and the crimes are Germans, and nationals of countries
overrun by Germany, and gypsies, and prisoners of war, and Jews of many
nationalities. All the elements of a conspiracy to commit the crimes
charged in paragraphs 6 and 11 are present and all will be clearly
established by the proof.
There were many co-conspirators who are not in the dock. Among the
planners and leaders of this plot were Conti and Grawitz, and Hippke
whose whereabouts is unknown. Among the actual executioners, Dr. Ding is
dead and Rascher is thought to be dead. There were many others.
Final judgment as to the relative degrees of guilt among those in the
dock must await the presentation of the proof in detail. Nevertheless,
before the introduction of evidence, it will be helpful to look again at
the defendants and their part in the conspiracy. What manner of men are
they, and what was their major role?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account