Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume I
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Germany surrendered herself to this foul conjunction of evil forces. The
nation fell victim to the Nazi scourge because its leaders lacked the
wisdom to foresee the consequences and the courage to stand firm in the
face of threats. Their failure was the inevitable outcome of that
sinister undercurrent of German philosophy which preaches the supreme
importance of the state and the complete subordination of the
individual. A nation in which the individual means nothing will find few
leaders courageous and able enough to serve its best interests.
Individual Germans did indeed give warning of what was in store, and
German doctors and scientists were numbered among the courageous few. At
a meeting of Bavarian psychiatrists held in Munich in 1931, when the
poisonous doctrines of the Nazis were already sweeping Germany, there
was a discussion of mercy killings and sterilization, and the Nazi views
on these matters, with which we are now familiar, were advanced. A
German professor named Oswald Bumke rose and made a reply more eloquent
and prophetic than anyone could have possibly realized at the time. He
said:
“I should like to make two additional remarks. One of them is,
please for God’s sake leave our present financial needs out of
all these considerations. This is a problem which concerns the
entire future of our people, indeed, one may say without being
over-emotional about it, the entire future of humanity. One
should approach this problem neither from the point of view of
our present scientific opinion nor from the point of view of the
still more ephemeral economic crises. If by sterilization we can
prevent the occurrence of mental disease then we should
certainly do it, not in order to save money for the government
but because every case of mental disease means infinite
suffering to the patient and to his relatives. But to introduce
economic points of view is not only inappropriate but outright
dangerous because the logical consequence of the thought that
for financial reasons all these human beings, who could be
dispensed with for the moment, should be exterminated, is a
quite monstrous logical conclusion; we would then have to put to
death not only the mentally sick and the psychopathic
personalities but all the crippled including the disabled
veterans, all old maids who do not work, all widows whose
children have completed their education, and all those who live
on their income or draw pensions. That would certainly save a
lot of money but the probability is that we will not do it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account