Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Was it not my first thought to limit the scope of euthanasia? Did I not,
the moment I was included, try to find a limit and demand a most
searching report on the incurables? Were not the appointed professors of
the universities there? Who could there be who was better qualified? But
I do not want to speak of these questions and of their execution. I am
defending myself against the charge of inhuman conduct and base
intentions. In the face of these charges I fight for my right to humane
treatment! I know how complicated this problem is. With the utmost
fervor I have tortured myself again and again, but no philosophy or
other wisdom helped me here. There was the decree and on it there was my
name. It is no good saying that I could have feigned sickness. I do not
live this life of mine in order to evade fate if I meet it. And thus I
assented to euthanasia. I fully realize the problem; it is as old as
mankind, but it is not a crime against man nor against humanity. It is
pity for the incurable, literally. Here I cannot believe like a
clergyman or think as a jurist. I am a doctor and I see the law of
nature as being the law of reason. In my heart there is love of mankind,
and so it is in my conscience. That is why I am a doctor!
When I talked at the time to Pastor Bodelschwingh, the only serious
admonisher I knew personally, it seemed at first as if our thoughts were
far apart; but the longer we talked and the more we came into the open,
the closer and the greater became our mutual understanding. At that time
we were not concerned with words. It was a struggle and a search far
beyond the human sphere. When the old Pastor Bodelschwingh left me after
many hours and we shook hands, his last words were: “That was the
hardest struggle of my life.” For him as well as for me that struggle
remained; and the problem remained too.
If I were to say today that I wish this problem had never come upon me
with its convulsive drama, that would be nothing but superficiality in
order to make me feel more comfortable in myself. But I am living in
these times and I see that they are full of antitheses. Somewhere we all
must make a stand. I am fully conscious that when I said “Yes” to
euthanasia I did so with the deepest conviction, just as it is my
conviction today, that it was right. Death can mean deliverance. Death
is life—just as much as birth. It was never meant to be murder. I bear
a burden, but it is not the burden of crime. I bear this burden of mine,
though with a heavy heart, as my responsibility. I stand before it, and
before my conscience, as a man and as a doctor.
B. Final Statement of Defendant Handloser[34]
During my first interrogations here in Nuernberg, in August 1946, the
interrogator declared to me:
First, you have been the Chief of the Army Medical Service. Whether or
not you knew of inadmissible experiments does not matter here. As the
Chief, you are responsible for everything.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account