Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The ethical foundation of these matters also seemed to be there until
this trial. Therefore, after sincere examination of my conscience, I
cannot find any feelings of guilt and expect with a clear and peaceful
conscience the verdict of the Tribunal.
K. Final Statement of Defendant Sievers[43]
Your Honors, in his opening plea, my defense counsel already stated
quite openly and frankly that all events were going to be presented with
which I was in any way connected, and in this hour which is so important
to me, I can state to the best of my conscience that when I furnished my
defense counsel with information, and during my own examination on the
witness stand, I always spoke the full truth.
I have, in fact, had the satisfaction to hear my testimony confirmed by
a witness for the prosecution. During my examination as a witness on the
stand, I said quite truthfully that the experimental subjects to whom I
had talked in connection with the last experiment in Natzweiler had
confirmed to me that they were voluntary subjects. Witness Nales,
witness for the prosecution, confirmed my testimony during his
examination on the 30th of June in this courtroom.
With regard to the charge of participation in the malaria experiments, I
have stated that I had nothing to do with malaria experiments. Witness
Vieweg, called by the prosecution, confirmed this testimony of mine, as
also did witness Stoehr.
I testified that the two experimented subjects whom I met in connection
with the altitude experiments, in reply to a question by me, confirmed
specifically that they had volunteered. Witness Neff of the prosecution
confirmed this voluntary status of the witnesses. Likewise Dr. Romberg
during his direct examination stated on the strength of his own
knowledge that my testimony was correct. The only experimental subject
whom I met in connection with the typhus experiments upon my definite
question regarding the voluntariness of his testimony, confirmed that
this was so. My testimony was also confirmed through the affidavit of a
former prisoner, and witness, Grunzenhuber, contained in my second
document book.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account