Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Prosecutor McHaney has explained in his plea that one still had to find
that doctor among the defendants who would have subjected himself to
such experiments as are covered by the indictment here. I do not feel
that that concerns me. Not only from the statement which I have made
here before you but also from my case history, which was available to
the authorities of the prison long before indictment, it can be seen
that not only did I repeatedly offer myself as an experimental subject
to test vaccines but that frequently in my official capacity and in my
research work I gave myself injections with cholera, typhus, malaria and
hepatitis epidemica and that I am still suffering from the consequences.
Finally, Prosecutor McHaney has asserted in his plea that all of those
indicted here are guilty of murder, and that includes me too. If the
Tribunal were to look at the present problem from this point of view, I
would regret having said a single word in my defense. However, if you
believe me, that in all actions of mine which have been discussed here,
I was only moved by sincere devotion to duty, then I put my fate with
confidence into your hands.
M. Final Statement of Defendant Ruff[45]
May it please the Tribunal: As far as the written and oral statements of
my defense counsel are concerned which deal with the points of the
indictment, and as far as my activities as a doctor and scientist are
concerned, I have nothing or hardly anything to add. I can only repeat
today what I said at the end of my examination when I was on the stand.
After detailed inquiry into my conscience, I still today hold the belief
that I never sinned against my duty as a man and as a doctor.
N. Final Statement of Defendant Brack[46]
Your Honor, I cannot be described as one of the earliest followers of
Hitler. In 1929, I joined the NSDAP when more than six million German
voters were already backing Hitler. His later successes during the years
of peaceful reconstruction consolidated my conviction that he had
forever liberated Germany from the misery in which it seemed to have
fallen. For all those years I had no reason to have any misgivings with
regard to Hitler’s personality. Therefore I also believed in the
legality of the euthanasia decree as it emanated directly from the head
of the state. The state officials and doctors, competent for me at that
time, told me that euthanasia had always been an endeavor of mankind and
was morally as well as medically justified. Therefore, I never doubted
the legal character of the euthanasia decree.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account