Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
I must also leave it to the Tribunal to judge whether a man who intended
the extermination of the Jews would apply for service with the army,
just at the moment when the aim which he is alleged to have pursued was
achieved, and the extermination measures had started. Or does it not
appear paradoxical to assume that one and the same man should give his
approval of the extermination of the Jews, and in fact aid such a
program, and, at the same time, save Jews he has never known, such as
Georgii, Passow, Meyer, Warburg, and others, from these measures?
I can only emphasize that particularly the sterilization suggestions to
Himmler appeared to me to be the last possibility to take any action to
save Jewry. Had I been indifferent to the Jewish fate, I would not be
accused today. But I also tried in this respect, as was my habit, to
give assistance and I am still convinced, that it had at least delaying,
if not preventative effect. It is certain that many Jews were in this
way saved from destruction. The realization that such proposals should
never have been made by me on the strength of my medical knowledge, my
capacities, or my position at the time, even to the best of my
intention, is something I could not reach until this trial was in
progress. My good intention, which was the basis of these proposals, and
my good will to help by means of them cannot be denied by anybody, and
can in no event be understood as my conscious cooperation in the
extermination of the Jews.
O. Final Statement of Defendant Romberg[47]
In the course of this trial, I have had full opportunity to speak in my
defense. With special gratitude we realize the great opportunity offered
to us, of which we took advantage, which was given by the possibility of
individually questioning Professor Ivy in this trial. I have seen how
the Tribunal itself, by a precise questioning, clarified the facts, and
to the statements made by my defense counsel I have nothing to add,
because they are the truth.
P. Final Statement of Defendant Becker-Freyseng[48]
Mr. President, Gentlemen of the Tribunal: I also was given opportunity
to submit all the statements and the evidence required to refute the
charges of the indictment. For that I have to thank the Tribunal and my
defense counsel, Dr. Tipp. But I have nothing to add to it. For all the
irrelevant, spiteful talk with which outside circles believed they had
to twist around the objectivity of these proceedings like thorn bushes,
the verdict of this Tribunal must be and will be the appropriate answer.
I look forward to it with the firm conviction that I never failed in my
duty to mankind as a physician and scientist, and as a soldier to my
Fatherland.
Q. Final Statement of Defendant Weltz[49]
I have nothing to add to the statement made by my defense counsel. I
thank Dr. Wille for his efforts made in my defense.
R. Final Statement of Defendant Schaefer[50]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account