Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The presentation of evidence to sustain the charges contained in the
indictment was begun by the prosecution on 9 December 1946. At the
conclusion of the prosecution’s case in chief the defendants began the
presentation of their evidence. All evidence in the case was concluded
on 3 July 1947. During the week beginning 14 July 1947 the Tribunal
heard arguments by counsel for the prosecution and defense. The personal
statements of the defendants were heard on 19 July 1947 on which date
the case was finally concluded.
The trial was conducted in two languages—English and German. It
consumed 139 trial days, including 6 days allocated for final arguments
and the personal statements of the defendants. During the 133 trial days
used for the presentation of evidence 32 witnesses gave oral evidence
for the prosecution and 53 witnesses, including the 23 defendants, gave
oral evidence for the defense. In addition, the prosecution put in
evidence as exhibits a total of 570 affidavits, reports, and documents;
the defense put in a total number of 901—making a grand total of 1,471
documents received in evidence.
Copies of all exhibits tendered by the prosecution in their case in
chief were furnished in the German language to the defendants prior to
the time of the reception of the exhibits in evidence.
Each defendant was represented at the arraignment and trial by counsel
of his own selection.
Whenever possible, all applications by defense counsel for the procuring
of the personal attendance of persons who made affidavits in behalf of
the prosecution were granted and the persons brought to Nuernberg for
interrogation or cross-examination by defense counsel. Throughout the
trial great latitude in presenting evidence was allowed defense counsel,
even to the point at times of receiving in evidence certain matters of
but scant probative value.
All of these steps were taken by the Tribunal in order to allow each
defendant to present his defense completely, in accordance with the
spirit and intent of Military Government Ordinance No. 7 which provides
that a defendant shall have the right to be represented by counsel, to
cross-examine prosecution witnesses, and to offer in the case all
evidence deemed to have probative value.
The evidence has now been submitted, final arguments of counsel have
been concluded, and the Tribunal has heard personal statements from each
of the defendants. All that remains to be accomplished in the case is
the rendition of judgment and the imposition of sentence.
THE JURISDICTION OF THE TRIBUNAL
The jurisdiction and powers of this Tribunal are fixed and determined by
Law No. 10 of the Control Council for Germany. The pertinent portions of
the Law with which we are concerned provide as follows:
ARTICLE II
“1. Each of the following acts is recognized as a crime:
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account