Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
During the course of the trial the defendants challenged the first count
of the indictment, alleging as grounds for their motion the fact that
under the basic law the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to try the
crime of conspiracy considered as a separate substantive offense. The
motion was set down for argument and duly argued by counsel for the
prosecution and the defense. Thereafter, in one of its trial sessions
the Tribunal granted the motion. That this judgment may be complete, the
ruling made at that time is incorporated in this judgment. The order
which was entered on the motion is as follows:
“It is the ruling of this Tribunal that neither the Charter of
the International Military Tribunal nor Control Council Law No.
10 has defined conspiracy to commit a war crime or crime against
humanity as a separate substantive crime; therefore, this
Tribunal has no jurisdiction to try any defendant upon a charge
of conspiracy considered as a separate substantive offense.
“Count I of the indictment, in addition to the separate charge
of conspiracy, also alleges unlawful participation in the
formulation and execution of plans to commit war crimes and
crimes against humanity which actually involved the commission
of such crimes. We, therefore, cannot properly strike the whole
of count I from the indictment, but, insofar as count I charges
the commission of the alleged crime of conspiracy as a separate
substantive offense, distinct from any war crime or crime
against humanity, the Tribunal will disregard that charge.
“This ruling must not be construed as limiting the force or
effect of Article 2, paragraph 2 of Control Council Law No. 10,
or as denying to either prosecution or defense the right to
offer in evidence any facts or circumstances occurring either
before or after September 1939, if such facts or circumstances
tend to prove or to disprove the commission by any defendant of
war crimes or crimes against humanity as defined in Control
Council Law No. 10.”
COUNTS TWO AND THREE—_War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity._ The
second and third counts of the indictment charge the commission of war
crimes and crimes against humanity. The counts are identical in content,
except for the fact that in count two the acts which are made the basis
for the charges are alleged to have been committed on “civilians and
members of the armed forces [of nations] then at war with the German
Reich [* * *] in the exercise of belligerent control”, whereas in count
three the criminal acts are alleged to have been committed against
“German civilians and nationals of other countries.” With this
distinction observed, both counts will be treated as one and discussed
together.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account