Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
As stated elsewhere, Gebhardt made a frank and candid report of what he
had been doing at Ravensbrueck; honestly telling the group that his
experimental subjects were not volunteers but were concentration camp
inmates condemned to death, who had been given the hope of reduction of
sentence should they survive the experiments. By means of charts to
illustrate his lecture, he made it clear that deaths had occurred among
the human subjects. When on the witness stand, the defendant Gebhardt
testified that prior to the meeting of consulting physicians he had
discussed with either Schreiber or the defendant Rostock the subject
matter of the lecture to be given, and that at that time Schreiber had
stated that he had received data concerning the experiments through
official channels.
At that time Schreiber was a direct subordinate of the defendant
Handloser, and we think it may be fairly assumed that Schreiber’s
knowledge was the knowledge of Handloser. However, be that as it may,
the evidence is clear that Handloser heard the lecture by Gebhardt, as
well as a subsequent lecture on the same subject matter given by the
defendant Fischer. There can be no question, therefore, but that when
Handloser came away from the meeting he was fully informed of the fact
that medical experiments were being conducted in Ravensbrueck
concentration camp with inmates who were nonvolunteers. Moreover, he
knew that deaths had occurred among the experimental subjects.
After the meeting of consulting physicians had ended, Gebhardt returned
to Ravensbrueck and conducted several more series of sulfanilamide
experiments. The subjects used for the later experiments were Polish
women who had been condemned to Ravensbrueck without trial, and who did
not give their consent to act as experimental subjects. Three of these
were killed by the experiments.
TYPHUS EXPERIMENTS
Under counts two and three of the indictment Handloser is charged with
special responsibility for, and participation in, typhus experiments
conducted in the Buchenwald concentration camp which were supervised by
a certain Dr. Ding, and like experiments conducted in the Natzweiler
concentration camp by a certain Dr. Haagen. As shown elsewhere in the
judgment, these experiments were unlawful and resulted in deaths of
non-German nationals.
There can be no question but that in 1941 typhus was a potential menace
to the German Army and to many German civilians. The use of an adequate
typhus vaccine was therefore a matter of prime importance. The
distribution of vaccines to the Wehrmacht was within the control of
Handloser. In the exercise of his functions he was also interested in
typhus vaccine production.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account