Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Every German officer holding a position comparable to that held by Dr.
Ding was required to keep a journal or diary showing his official
activities. It appears that Ding kept two diaries. Ding’s personal diary
containing official and personal entries and work reports has
disappeared; his official log or journal concerning his work at
Buchenwald is the document in evidence. This diary was kept by one Eugen
Kogon, an inmate at Buchenwald. He made the actual entries and Ding
verified and signed them.
Kogon, an Austrian subject, testified for the prosecution. We learn from
his testimony that he was a former newspaper editor and held other
highly responsible positions. He was sent by the German authorities to
Buchenwald in 1939 as a political prisoner. In April 1943 he was
assigned to Ding as a clerk or assistant. For many months prior to that
time, however, he had been on extremely friendly terms with Ding and as
a consequence was completely familiar with Ding’s operations. Indeed, so
close was the attachment that during the first half of the year 1942
Ding had dictated the first portion of the diary which is in evidence,
and Kogon had transcribed it. After officially becoming Ding’s assistant
in 1943 all correspondence of every nature with which Ding was concerned
passed through the hands of Kogon.
The diary came into Kogon’s possession at the breaking up of the camp,
and remained in his possession, as he testified, until he delivered it
to the Office of Chief of Counsel for War Crimes at Nuernberg.
It is manifest that the entries in the diary were often not made on the
day they bear date; but this does not mean that it has no probative
value. Almost every entry in the diary is personally signed by Ding.
Time and again the entries in the diary have been corroborated by other
credible evidence. The defendants themselves who were familiar with
operations at Buchenwald have confirmed the entries in important
essential particulars. We consider the diary as constituting evidence of
considerable probative value, and shall give to the entries such
consideration as under all circumstances they are entitled to receive.
The first entry in the Ding diary, under date of 29 December 1941, reads
as follows:
“Conference between Army Sanitation Inspection [Inspector],
General Chief Surgeon Professor Dr. Handloser; State Secretary
for the Department of Health of the Reich, SS Gruppenfuehrer Dr.
Conti; President Professor Reiter of the Health Department of
the Reich; President Professor Gildemeister of the Robert Koch
Institute (Reich Institution to Combat Contagious Diseases) and
SS Standartenfuehrer and Lecturer (Dozent) Dr. Mrugowsky of the
Institute of Hygiene, Waffen SS, Berlin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account