Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It is not contended that such experiments were not carried out. In the
course of these experiments two buildings or “blocks” were used. The
experiments were conducted in Block 46, and when satisfactory vaccine
was decided upon, Block 50 was used for the preparation of vaccines.
During the course of the experiments with vaccines in March 1942, Ding
himself contracted typhus. Genzken testified that he was aware of the
fact that concentration camp inmates were subjected to experiments, but
stated that he was not advised as to the method of experimentation.
It is clear that the experiments necessary to decide upon a satisfactory
vaccine preceded by a considerable period the production of the vaccine.
Genzken testified that vaccine production began in December 1943, that
the production establishment only moved into Block 50 in the middle of
August, and that when production actually began “this establishment had
already come under the agency of Grawitz and it was not subordinated any
more” to him.
Under date of 9 January 1943 the Ding diary contains a lengthy entry
stating that by Genzken’s order the typhus research station became the
“Department of Typhus and Virus Research,” that Dr. Ding would be head
of this department, and that during his absence defendant Hoven would
act in his place. The entry further stated that Ding was appointed chief
department head for special missions in hygiene, etc. The Ding diary is
discussed elsewhere in this judgment. Considering the demonstrated
desire of Ding for his personal aggrandizement, this entry is not
entitled to entire credit, as written. It refers to Genzken as “Major
General”—which rank he did not receive until a few weeks after 9
January 1943. The entry, however, has some probative value upon the
question of Ding’s status during the year 1943.
Genzken testified that he “approved” the establishment of Ding’s
department for vaccine research. He also testified that his department
furnished necessary funds from its budget for Ding’s investigations.
From the evidence it appears that prior to 1 September 1943, Mrugowsky
reported regularly to Genzken, on an average of once per week, either
orally or in writing.
Under date 5 May 1942, Mrugowsky signed a written report upon the
subject, “Testing Typhus Vaccines.” This report went to six different
offices: the first copy, to Conti; the second copy, to Grawitz; and the
third copy, to Genzken. The report commences: “The tests of four typhus
vaccines made by us on human subjects at the instigation of the Reich
Health Leader Dr. Conti had the following results * * *”. It is stated
that the mortality of victims of typhus during an epidemic “was around
30 percent” and that “during the same epidemic four groups of
experimental subjects were vaccinated with one each” of the four types
of vaccine described in the beginning of the report.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account