Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
These entries are but few of the many which we have taken at random from
the Ding diary, dealing with the sordid murders of defenseless victims
in the name of Nazi medical science. Many more could be set forth if
time and space permitted. An analysis of the Ding diary discloses that
no less than 729 concentration camp inmates were experimented on with
typhus, at least 154 of whom died. And this toll of death takes no
account of the certain demise of scores of so-called “passage” persons
who were artificially infected with typhus for the sole purpose of
having at hand an ever-ready supply of fresh blood “sick with typhus” to
be used to infect the experimental subjects.
There is some evidence to the effect that the camp inmates used as
subjects in the first series submitted to being used as experimental
subjects after being told that the experiments were harmless and that
additional food would be given to volunteers. But these victims were not
informed that they would be artificially infected with a highly virulent
virus nor that they might die as a result. Certainly no one would
seriously suggest that under the circumstances these men gave their
legal consent to act as subjects. One does not ordinarily consent to be
the special object of a murder, and if one did, such consent would not
absolve his slayer.
Later, when news of what was happening in Block 46 became generally
known in the camp, it was no longer possible to delude the inmates into
offering themselves as victims. Thereupon, the shabby pretense of
seeking volunteers was dropped and the experimental subjects were taken
arbitrarily from a list of inmates prepared by the camp administration.
Other experiments were also carried out in Block 46 of Buchenwald to
test typhoid, para-typhoid A and B, and yellow fever.
As in the typhus experiments, nonconsenting human subjects were used,
including not only German criminal prisoners but also Poles, Russians,
and Frenchmen, both civilians and prisoners of war.
In all the typhus experiments, death resulted to many experimental
subjects. As to each of these experiments the evidence is overwhelming
that they were carried out by Ding under the orders or authority of the
defendant Mrugowsky.
POISON EXPERIMENTS
On 11 September 1944 Mrugowsky, Ding, and a certain Dr. Widmann carried
out an experiment with aconitin nitrate projectiles in the Sachenshausen
concentration camp. Details of the experiment are fully explained by a
“Top Secret” report of the sordid affair in a letter written by the
defendant Mrugowsky to the Criminological Institute, Berlin. The letter
follows:
“Subject: Experiments with aconitin nitrate projectiles.
To the Criminological Institute
Attn: Dr. Widmann
Berlin
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account