Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“The other two experimental subjects had already early shown a
pale face. The other symptoms were the same. The motor unrest
increased so much that the persons flung themselves up, then
down, rolled their eyes, and made meaningless motions with their
hands and arms. Finally the agitation subsided, the pupils
dilated to the maximum, and the condemned lay motionless.
Masseter spasms and urination were observed in one case. Death
occurred 121, 123 and 129 minutes after entry of the projectile.
“_Summary._ The projectiles filled with approximately 38 mg. of
aconitin nitrate in solid form had, in spite of only
insignificant injuries, a deadly effect after two hours.
Poisoning showed 20 to 25 minutes after injury. The main
reactions were: salivation, alteration of the pupils, negative
tendon reflexes, motor unrest, and extreme nausea.
“MRUGOWSKY
“SS Lecturer Oberfuehrer and Office Chief.”
The defendant attempts to meet this charge with the defense that the
subjects used in this experiment were persons who had been condemned to
death and that he, Mrugowsky, had been appointed as their legal
executioner.
One need but read the letter introduced in evidence to arrive at the
conclusion that the defense has no validity. This was not a legal
execution carried out in conformance with the laws and rules of war, but
a criminal medical experiment wherein wounds were inflicted on prisoners
with the sole end in view of determining the effectiveness of poisoned
bullets as a means of taking life. The hapless victims of this dastardly
torture were Russian prisoners of war, entitled to the protection
afforded by the laws of civilized nations. As has been said, in
substance, in this judgment: While under certain specific conditions the
rules of land warfare may recognize the validity of an execution by
shooting, it will not under any circumstances countenance the infliction
of death by maiming or torture.
SULFANILAMIDE EXPERIMENTS
That Mrugowsky rendered assistance to Gebhardt in the sulfanilamide
experiments at Ravensbrueck is plainly shown by the record. Mrugowsky
put his laboratory and co-workers at Gebhardt’s disposal. He furnished
the cultures for the infections. It was on the suggestion of Mrugowsky’s
office that wood shavings and ground glass were placed in the wounds of
the subjects so that battlefield wounds would be more closely simulated.
GAS OEDEMA EXPERIMENTS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account