Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Poppendick attended the Third Meeting of Consulting Surgeons at the
Military Medical Academy, Berlin, and heard lectures by Gebhardt and
Fischer concerning the sulfanilamide experiments, which have been
discussed elsewhere in this judgment. Under date of 7 September 1942 he
signed a certificate to a true copy of a report, concerning
sulfanilamide experiments which had been conducted at Ravensbrueck, made
by Gebhardt to Grawitz. Grawitz forwarded the report, or a certified
copy thereof, to Himmler.
We are of the opinion that Poppendick had knowledge of the criminal
nature of the experiments conducted by Gebhardt and Fischer at
Ravensbrueck, but the defendant’s criminal connection with any such
experiments has not been proved by the evidence.
SEA-WATER EXPERIMENTS
The evidence does not disclose beyond a reasonable doubt that Poppendick
was criminally implicated in these experiments.
EPIDEMIC JAUNDICE EXPERIMENTS
The evidence does not disclose beyond a reasonable doubt that Poppendick
was criminally implicated in these experiments.
STERILIZATION EXPERIMENTS
Poppendick was Chief Physician of the Main Race and Settlement Office.
The judgment of the International Military Tribunal found that this
office was “active in carrying out schemes for Germanization of occupied
territories according to the racial principles of the Nazi Party and
were involved in the deportation of Jews and other foreign nationals.”
(_See the “Trial of the Major War Criminals,” Vol. 1, p. 270._)
Testifying before this Tribunal, Poppendick stated that the Nazi racial
policy was twofold in aspect; one policy being positive, the other,
negative in character. The positive policy included many matters, one
being the encouragement of German families to produce more children. The
negative policy concerned the sterilization and extermination of
non-Aryans as well as other measures to reduce the non-Aryan population.
According to Poppendick’s testimony, he was not concerned with the
execution of negative, but only with positive measures.
By letter dated 29 May 1941 Grawitz wrote to Himmler concerning a
conference held on 27 May 1941 at which Dr. Clauberg was present, and
discussed his “new method of sterilization of inferior women without an
operation.”
Poppendick by letter dated 4 June 1941, which referred to a previous
telephone conversation with Grawitz, wrote Rudolf Brandt stating that he
was enclosing “the list of physicians who are prepared to perform the
treatment of sterility” as requested by Himmler. The list referred to is
evidently the same as was contained in a letter from Grawitz to Himmler,
dated 30 May 1941, which stated: “In the following, I submit a list of
specialists in charge of the treatment of sterility in women according
to the method of Professor Clauberg.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account