Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
It is obvious from the evidence that throughout his entire service at
Buchenwald, Hoven attempted to serve three masters: the SS camp
administration, the criminal prisoners, and the political prisoners of
the camp. As a result he became criminally implicated in murders
committed by all three groups involving the deaths of non-German
nationals, some of whom were prisoners of war and others of whom were
civilians. In addition to these, he committed murders on his own
individual responsibility. There can be nothing said in mitigation of
such conduct. To the extent that the crimes committed by Hoven were not
war crimes, they were crimes against humanity.
MEMBERSHIP IN CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
Under count four of the indictment the defendant is charged with being a
member of an organization declared criminal by the judgment of the
International Military Tribunal, namely, the SS. The evidence shows that
Hoven became a member of the SS in 1934, and remained in this
organization throughout the war. As a member of the SS he was criminally
implicated in the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity,
as charged under counts two and three of the indictment.
CONCLUSION
Military Tribunal I finds and adjudges the defendant Waldemar Hoven
guilty, under counts two, three and four of the indictment.
BEIGLBOECK
The defendant Beiglboeck is charged under counts two and three of the
indictment with personal responsibility for, and participation in
Sea-Water Experiments.
The defendant Beiglboeck, an Austrian citizen, was a captain in the
medical department of the German Air Force from May 1941 until the end
of the war. In June 1944, while stationed at the hospital for
paratroopers at Tarvis [Tarvisio], Italy, he received orders from his
military and medical superior, defendant Becker-Freyseng, to carry out
sea-water experiments at Dachau.
The sea-water experiments have been described in detail in those
portions of the judgment dealing with defendants Schroeder and
Becker-Freyseng.
The defendant Beiglboeck testified that he reported to Berlin at the end
of June 1944, where Becker-Freyseng told him the nature and purpose of
the experiments. Upon that trip he also reported to and talked with the
defendant Schroeder. From these conversations he learned that the prime
purpose of the experiments was to test the process developed by Berka
for making sea water potable and also to ascertain whether it would be
better for a shipwrecked person in distress at sea to go completely
without sea water or to drink small quantities thereof.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account