Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Since the defendants Gebhardt, Fischer, and Oberheuser have put
particular stress on this alleged defense, I should like to make a few
remarks in that connection, but it should be remembered that they apply
with equal force to most of the other defendants. Gebhardt, speaking for
his co-defendants Fischer and Oberheuser, took the position that the
Polish women who had been used in the sulfanilamide experiments had been
condemned to death for participation in a resistance movement and that
by undergoing the experiments voluntarily or otherwise, they were to
have their death sentences commuted to some lesser degree of punishment,
provided they survived the experiments. This was no bargain reached with
the experimental subjects; their wishes were not consulted in the
matter. It was, according to Gebhardt, left to the good faith of someone
unnamed to see to it that the death sentences were not carried out on
the survivors of the experiments. Certainly Gebhardt, Fischer, and
Oberheuser assumed no responsibility or even interest in that regard.
It should be pointed out that the proof shows that the experimental
subjects who testified before this Tribunal were never so much as
afforded trial; they had no opportunity to defend themselves against
whatever crimes they were said to have committed. They were simply
arrested and interrogated by the Gestapo in Poland and sent to the
concentration camp. They had never so much as been informed that they
had been _marked for_, not sentenced to, death. Article 30 of the
Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, annexed to
the Hague Convention, specifically provides that even a spy “shall not
be punished without previous trial”.
Gebhardt would have the Tribunal believe that _but for_ the experiments
all these Polish girls would be dead; that he preserved the evidence
which was used against him. Nothing could be further from the truth.
There is no proof in the record that these women would have been
executed if they had not undergone the experiments. The witness Maczka
is living proof of the contrary. She was arrested for resistance
activities on 11 September 1941 and shipped to Ravensbrueck on 13
September. She was not an experimental subject yet she lives today.
Substantially all of the Polish experimental subjects arrived in
Ravensbrueck in September 1941. These girls had not been executed by
August 1942 when the experiments began. There were some 700 Polish girls
in that transport. There is no evidence that a substantial number were
ever executed even though most of them were not experimented on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account