Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The proof submitted by the prosecution has shown beyond controversy that
these Polish women _could not have been legally executed_. The right to
grant pardons in cases of death sentences was exclusively vested in
Hitler by a decree of 1 February 1935. On 2 May 1935, Hitler delegated
the right to make negative decisions on pardon applications to the Reich
Minister of Justice. On 30 January 1940, Hitler delegated to the
Governor General for the occupied Polish territories the authority to
grant and deny pardons for the occupied Polish territories. By edict
dated 8 March 1940, the Governor General of occupied Poland ordered
that—
“The execution of a death sentence promulgated by a regular
court, a special court, or a police court martial, shall take
place only when my decision has been issued not to make use of
my right to pardon.” (_NO-3073, Pros. Ex. 534._)
Thus, even though we assume _arguendo_, that the experimental subjects
had all committed substantial crimes, that they were all properly tried
by a duly constituted court of law, and that they were legally sentenced
to death, it is still clear from these decrees that these women could
not have been legally executed until such time as the Governor General
of occupied Poland had decided in each case not to make use of his
pardon right. There has been no proof that the Governor General ever
acted with respect to pardoning the Polish women used in the
experiments, or, for that matter, any substantial number of those not
used in the experiments. The only reason these 700 Polish women were
transported from Warsaw and Lublin to Ravensbrueck, in the first place,
was because the Governor General had not approved their execution.
Otherwise they would have been immediately executed in Poland. At the
very least, these women were entitled to remain unmolested so long as
the Governor General took no action. He may never have acted or, when he
did, he may have acted favorably on the pardon. Who is to say that the
majority of these 700 women did not live through the war even though
they did not undergo the experiments? Certainly it was incumbent on the
defense to prove the contrary by a preponderance of the evidence. This
it did not do by any evidence.
The defendants Gebhardt, Fischer, and Oberheuser certainly cannot claim
that they believed in good faith that the Polish women could have been
legally executed. Even the camp doctor, Schiedlausky, knew that the
Governor General had to approve each execution. Moreover, the large
number of 700 women being sentenced to death at this early stage of the
war was enough to put any reasonable person on notice that something was
wrong.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account