Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
myself willing to fulfill this request. In accordance with the purpose
of this job, I made not only the usual report, but a rather more
detailed report on the symptoms of poisoning. There is the report which
we have here in this prosecution document.
Q. You have said that this ammunition which was captured was of Russian
production. How can that be proved?
A. The prosecution itself proved that. To this Document NO-201,
Prosecution Exhibit 290, some files were attached which were not
included in my report. There are three drawings of cross-sections of
these bullets which were made and handed in to the Institute. The
heading is “Poison bullet from a Russian pistol, calibre 7.65” and
details about the construction of this bullet.
Q. You say that this photostatic copy of the drawings of the bullet was
not part of your report. How is that shown? Will you compare the stamps
in the diary?
A. The report which I handed in is dated 12 September 1944, and then the
next day it was received by the Criminal Technical Office, and the
receipt stamp carried the number “Secret 53”. The drawings, however,
have a different secret journal number, that is, 15-1944. If the number
G-53 was in September then, if the distribution of letters received is
assumed to be even throughout the year, I should assume that the Reich
Criminal Police Office received these drawings in March of the same
year. At that time I did not know anything about this attack, and the
experiment had not been started yet. Nor did I know any details about
the possibility of such poison warfare.
Q. Who was present at the execution?
A. Dr. Ding, who happened to be in Berlin and whom I took with me in
order to support my observations; it was he who conducted the actual
medical examination. I, myself, merely ascertained the occurrence of
death. Also Dr. Wittmann, representing the Criminal Technical Institute;
also a representative of the camp commandant, I believe the adjutant;
and an Untersturmfuehrer who performed the execution, that is, actually
shot the people. It is possible that there were others whom I do not
remember and whose names I do not know.
Q. Did you investigate in any way who these people were who were
executed, and by what court they had been condemned to death?
A. I talked with the people; they understood German; they were
apparently Germans. I considered them ethnic Germans [Volksdeutsche] of
whom we had large numbers in Germany at that time. On the other hand, I
knew that in concentration camps executions were carried out, and I had
been told that this was an official matter and that there had to be an
official representative of the camp commandant present. The fact that
such a representative was present at this execution was sufficient for
me to assume that the matter actually was official and, on the other
hand, I had no opportunity to be informed of the sentence or anything
like that.
Q. Then you did not see the death sentence order before it was carried
out?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account