Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
DEFENDANT MRUGOWSKY: This was not an experiment in the actual sense of
the word. It was the legal execution of five thieves, and some special
facts were to be ascertained during this execution. The details were as
follows: One day the chemist of the Reich Criminal Police Office, Dr.
Wittmann, came to me. He asked me to attend an execution as the official
doctor. As the reason for this request he added that in the General
Government in Poland a high official had been injured when he was
attacked with a revolver; that the bullet had inflicted only a harmless
flesh wound, but nevertheless the person had died after a few hours with
symptoms of poisoning. The person who had attacked him had been
arrested, and the rest of the ammunition was a hollow ball which
contained a crystallized poison. The Chemical Institute of the Reich
Criminal Police Office tested this and found that it was aconitine. The
ammunition was of Russian origin. There is no aconitine in Germany; it
is imported. The question was whether this was the first case of the
beginning of poison warfare against Germany. We had been expecting such
a method of warfare for some time. For that reason there was not only
criminal interest in clearing up this case but a general interest of the
greatest importance. This ammunition was to be tested on five thieves
who were to be executed anyhow, and it was to be seen whether this
crystallized poison contained another poison which had not been found in
the chemical tests. The remainder of the original Russian ammunition was
to be used, and also German ammunition which had been made in imitation
of the Russian. At the same time—and this was the main purpose of the
experiment—it was to be discovered how much time would elapse between
the injury and the appearance of the symptoms of poisoning, in order, if
necessary, to be able to use an antidote. This question was of such
great importance because an antidote to aconitine is hardly known, and
if this had actually been the beginning of poison warfare, then efforts
would have to be made immediately to find an antidote. Therefore, the
head of the Reich Criminal Police Office asked me, and the Chief of the
Criminal Technical Office also asked me, to participate in the execution
myself, although that was not actually my work; but Dr. Wittmann said he
did not know of any toxicologist except one in Berlin; they had all been
drafted, and as a bacteriologist I had a certain amount of experience in
symptoms of poisoning connected with bacteria and, therefore, he asked
me to take over this job. I was rather unwilling to do so. I pointed out
to Dr. Wittmann that the regular police in Vienna had a pharmacologist
who was very experienced and I suggested that he should be called upon;
but this was not done because of the poor communications resulting from
the air warfare. Since, on the other hand, this question was doubtless
of great significance and should not be postponed, I finally declared
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account