Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
DEFENDANT ROSE: Yes. That happened once again before a large number of
people, but it was not about typhus experiments. It must have been about
October 1944. The question at hand then was grippe. There was a meeting,
a rather large meeting at which grippe vaccine was discussed. A number
of people reported on the vaccines which they had developed in the
laboratory. Among others, Professor Herzberg reported on a vaccine made
from dead grippe virus, and Professor Haagen on a vaccine made from
living avirulent grippe virus, which he had already tested on personnel
at the Strasbourg clinic. Someone in the meeting, I don’t remember who,
suggested that the Haagen tests had been insufficient, and that this
vaccine should be tested on a larger number of persons. There was no
mention of concentration camps then but of student companies. I had
considerable misgivings about such experimental vaccination and
expressed them. I said that I considered the experimental basis
inadequate for these vaccines to be used on human beings. I was not
convinced that the virus had been sufficiently attenuated. There was a
danger that the vaccine would lead to infection, and one could not take
that responsibility on one’s self. It was first of all intended to
observe the effectiveness of the protection by determining whether
people fell ill of grippe in natural ways after being vaccinated. Then
someone else made the suggestion that this would take too long, and we
did not know whether there would be an influenza epidemic during that
time, and that therefore after the vaccines the subject should be
infected with a virulent virus. Since I had already expressed objections
to the vaccination, I opposed this proposal even more strongly, and the
result of this discussion was that infections were not carried out, but
it was decided to carry out the vaccination. Whether these vaccinations
were carried out or not, I do not know. At any rate I read no order to
the effect that anyone should perform the vaccinations nor did I ever
read a report that the vaccinations were carried out. Only later on in
imprisonment did I hear that similar experiments, such as were then
discussed, and of which I disapproved, were carried out by the British
Medical Service on German PW’s. Genzken probably participated personally
in this, but I had heard about this before in the internment hospital
Karlsruhe where there were people who had experienced these
vaccinations.
* * * * *
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF PROSECUTION WITNESS
PROFESSOR WERNER LEIBBRANDT[24]
* * * * *
_CROSS-EXAMINATION_
DR. SERVATIUS: Witness, you stated that the performance of experiments
on human beings, as is the subject of the indictment here, can be
ascribed to biological thought. What do you mean by biological thought?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account