Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
* * * * *
_EXTRACT FROM THE CLOSING BRIEF FOR
DEFENDANT ROSTOCK_
_Introduction_
Mr. President, your Honors:
The great English historian and sociologist, Thomas Carlyle, once said,
“Your life, and were you the humblest of human beings, is not a wild
dream but a lofty fact.” I do not want to speak to you in this courtroom
without first recalling this saying and thereby seeing before my eyes
the picture of the great number of our fellow human beings whose lives
have really become a wild dream. The fact on which this trial is based,
that defenseless human beings were used by doctors of my country for
experiments and in part died after suffering tortures, cannot be denied.
I, myself, would doubt the clarity of my judgment as a German jurist if
I did not realize that general human rights, such as the fundamental
standards anchored in all civilized nations, have been violated thereby.
Medical science should bring help and healing to suffering humanity. I
am proud to state that it was German doctors who, in the last century,
saved millions of human beings from the most serious and fatal diseases
by their research. Let me remind you only of names such as Robert Koch,
Emil von Behring, Paul Ehrlich, Theodor Billroth, and August Bier, or
medicines such as Germanin, atabrine, Salvarsan, diphtheria serum,
tetanus serum, and many others. If it were possible to achieve such
decisive results in any other way, this would only confirm the actual
truth, that no one, no matter how highly placed and no matter how
important his aims, has the right to lower other human beings to the
level of guinea pigs by force. How could a man venture to dispose in
that way of the life and health of his fellow men, be they ever so
humble? It seems to me that this involves a fundamental contradiction to
the duty of the doctor, a violation of the dignity of the individual,
and a presumption which cannot remain without horrible results. There
may be doubtful cases, there may be borderline cases, but the solution
of these questions can be based on only one principle, which is that all
creatures in human form have an equal right to life and health. Humanity
would be in a sad state if again and again there were not volunteers
from the ranks of physicians and laymen who made themselves available
for experiments, conscious of their contribution toward saving and
healing other human beings. But how can a man dare simply to designate
others to suffer and die, when they, too, like to live and be free from
want and fear, just like he himself? * * *
3. MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS IN OTHER COUNTRIES
a. Introduction
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account