Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Although this Tribunal is internationally constituted, it is an
American court. The obligations which derive from these proceedings
are, therefore, particularly binding on the United States. True it is
that two wrongs do not make a right, and equally true that the crimes
charged against these defendants and the other leaders of the Third
Reich were “so calculating, so malignant, and so devastating” that
they find no modern parallel. But, underlying these crimes, there are
myths, superstitions, and more sophisticated distortions of philosophy
which do not know national boundaries. If we, of all nations fail to
rise above these malignant doctrines by actions which manifest a steady
growth in national fiber and character, then all that we do here will
come to nothing, and will leave us and mankind an easy prey to their
next violent eruption.
We have still other obligations here which must not be overlooked.
As was pointed out earlier, we have undertaken, together with other
nations, the task of preparing “for the eventual reconstruction of
German political life on a democratic basis and for eventual peaceful
cooperation in international life in Germany.”
These proceedings are dedicated to that end. Punishment of these
leaders of Germany whose crimes made this task necessary is only a part
of what we seek to accomplish here. We seek to resurrect the truth
in Germany, and to reinvigorate those ideals that have been so long
desecrated. The people of Germany sense the need for this, but they
will measure our efforts by the measure of our own devotion to the
ideals which we proclaim.
The United States cannot evade the challenge of these responsibilities.
We can fulfill only the smallest part of them at Nuernberg.
But Nuernberg must be a symbol, not of revenge or of smug
self-satisfaction, but of peace and good will among nations and
peoples. It is the crime of shattering the foundations of peace and
denying the very fact of humanity that is charged in this and other
proceedings at Nuernberg. It is by trying these charges under law,
and in quest of truth, that Nuernberg will find its full measure of
justification.
B. Opening Statement for all Defendants[71]
DR. KUBUSCHOK (counsel for defendant Schlegelberger, speaking
on behalf of all the defendants): May it please the Tribunal. In the
following statements I shall briefly describe the manner in which the
defense believes, by summarizing the treatment of individual general
problems, it will expedite the trial. My following statements are to be
interpreted in that sense.
The prosecution views the development of justice in administration and
jurisdiction during the period of the National Socialist State. It
limits its reflections to this period and perceives in everything the
consequent execution of National Socialist totalitarian thought. It
believes to be able to reduce all phenomena to this denominator.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account