Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
to social, political and economic aspects could not be regulated by
codified law alone; especially so, because codified law always lagged
one step behind the case in need of settlement of law. Such cases could
not, as is possible in “common law,” be regulated and decided on by
general concepts of law; they merely gave cause for establishing new
legal standards. This one example already reveals the necessity of
dealing with the existing German legal system and with plans for reform
entertained in Germany for decades.
German law will form the basis for all considerations. We will,
therefore, also have to deal with constitutional law and the technique
of legislation. We shall proceed from the provisions of the Weimar
constitution. We shall observe there the legislative functions of
the Reichstag, the Reichsrat [Council of the Reich] and the Reich
President. It will be shown that, since Bruening was Reich Chancellor,
the weight of legislation shifted in ever increasing measure toward the
right of the Reich President to issue emergency decrees.
The turning point was formed by the Enabling Act [Ermaechtigungsgesetz]
of 24 March 1933 which represents the basis for all future legislation.
The cabinet was now empowered to pass laws on its own authority and
even the right of the Reich President to draft and promulgate laws was
abandoned. Thus, under consideration of article 56 of the constitution
which allocated powers of policy determination to the Reich Chancellor,
the right to legislate was practically conferred upon Reich Chancellor
Hitler who, in the absence of time, made increasingly extensive use of
it. The lawful passing of a law and its legal effects will necessarily
be the subject of presentation.
Thus, we are faced with the legal problem of the binding effect of the
Fuehrer order. It will have to be examined whether this Fuehrer order
was a literal order in the meaning of the Control Council Law, the
effect of which is not to be looked upon as exempting from guilt, or,
at the most as mitigating, or, whether we are not dealing here with a
legislative act, to which this provision of the Control Council Law
does not apply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account