Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
So that the jurisdiction in so-called Night and Fog [Nacht und
Nebelsachen--NN] cases, can be judged, we shall put in evidence that
in the main the military courts alone were competent. Section 3,
paragraph 2, of the Decree for Military Jurisdiction During Wartime
[Kriegsstrafverfahrensordnung] formed the legal basis for handing over
those cases to the general courts. This decree concerning military
jurisdiction during wartime and special operations was issued on 17
August 1938, and published in the Reich Law Gazette 1939, part I, page
1457. It was only signed by the Fuehrer and Reichskanzler and by the
Chef des Oberkommandos der Wehrmacht [Chief of the Supreme Command of
the Armed Forces].
This decree fixes the scope of military jurisdiction and subordinates
all foreigners and Germans to this military jurisdiction for all
criminal offenses committed by them in the area of operations.
According to section 3, paragraph 2, of this decree, military courts
however are to prosecute such crimes only if it is judged necessary
for military reasons. It is within their discretion to turn over the
prosecution of criminal cases to the general courts.
On the basis of this legal foundation, and in accordance with an
agreement between the Chief of the Armed Forces Legal Department, Dr.
Lehmann--who has appeared here before the Tribunal as witness--and the
former Under Secretary Dr. Freisler, prisoners held in Night and Fog
cases were placed before a German court in the sense of paragraph 30 of
the Hague Regulations on Land Warfare.
The fact that the proceedings [of an NN case] were kept secret in all
its phases was justified for military reasons. According to paragraph 6
of the basic treaty of the Hague Regulations on Land Warfare, military
interests come first, and then comes the protection of the civilian
population. The administrators of justice could not decide about the
scope of the military interests. It could never be the task of the
civilian judicial authorities to judge whether the military commanders
correctly interpreted the competition of military necessity in the
sense of subparagraph 8 of the introduction to the basic treaty of the
Hague Regulations on Land Warfare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account