Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
DR. KUBUSCHOK: If, in my statement concerning the defense in
general,[74] I have just pointed out that the administration of justice
in the National Socialist State cannot be judged separately but must
be judged in the light of the whole administration of the Reich and
its head, the dictatorship, I shall have to refer thus in defending
the defendant Schlegelberger again and again to his personality, quite
apart from dealing with the objective facts as propounded by the
prosecution in order to judge and interpret actions in their proper
light.
Franz Schlegelberger was, after many years of service to both the
administration of justice and the jurisprudence, already Under
Secretary when Hitler came to power. He kept this position until August
1942 when Hitler, according to his pronouncements wanted to build up
a National Socialist administration of justice. Schlegelberger had
always been dealing with civil law. We will outline this, his activity,
in general. When in January 1941 after the death of the Minister of
Justice Guertner, he took over the administration of the Ministry of
Justice as the then oldest Under Secretary according to rank, so to
speak; only then did he, in this position, and to the extent of that
position, have to deal with criminal cases.
If the prosecution on account of this, his position, has indicted
him on these individual counts and included him in the common legal
framework of conspiracy, the defense will first of all show that
Control Council Law No. 10 does not provide a legal basis for an
indictment of conspiracy to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
My colleague, Dr. Haensel, responsible for the entire defense, has
taken over this subject and will make the necessary statements and
put forward motions. In addition, I, myself, will submit sufficient
evidence to prove that with a person of Schlegelberger’s caliber,
conspiracy and violent thinking are incompatible. I shall submit
proof, as to his basic attitude during the whole of his tenure of
office, that he could never have either favored or promoted principles
of violent thinking, that on the contrary, all his activities were
aimed at preventing or at least modifying the course set by Hitler’s
dictatorship. We shall see, how he wrestled with the opposing forces
of the Party, and how unequally distributed the powers were, and how
his defensive attitude was breached but forcibly. We shall learn how
much Hitler had always disliked the administration of justice and its
expert administrators, and that, at a time, when not only the whole of
the administration in Germany but also the entire public life, even
to a certain extent private life, had already been “coordinated” and
shaped according to National Socialist ideas. On 20 August 1942, he
had to realize the fact that he had to build up a “National Socialist
administration of justice.” Does this not constitute the truest
judgment of Schlegelberger that he be judged by a man, who after all,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account