Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
To this, from a psychological viewpoint, belongs the discussion of
Rothaug’s actual basic attitude toward the Jewish problem in order to
do away with all insinuations which have willfully and on purpose been
made during this trial by persons who seem to have cause to stress and
demonstrate their innocence in this connection by calling “catch the
thief.”
Another complex fitted into the direction of the main thrust of the
prosecution is Rothaug’s alleged political power position, inflated so
as to appear almost like a myth, which to begin with is supported by an
assertion which is the object of count four of the indictment. I shall
prove that Rothaug’s duties did not extend beyond the professional
organization of the Rechtswahrerbund and that, beyond that, he held
no political post, and that in particular he did not belong anywhere,
at any time, and in any function to the so-called corps of political
leaders.
In this I shall take special care to reduce the case Doebig which has
been brought into this context for the purpose of substantiation, to
the proportions it deserves in the knowledge of the true facts of the
case, as we ourselves feel urged to clear Rothaug’s real relationship
to the Security Service (SD) as expressed in its principles,
development, contents, and Rothaug’s inner attitude to it down to
minute details.
Especially here as in all positions where the witnesses are interested
in a certain presentation of conditions, we are fully conscious of the
difficulties, and we know how easy it is today to find witnesses who by
incriminating statements are given the chance to clear themselves. On
the other hand, bearing in mind the totality of present psychological
conditions it is difficult to find a person who would be prepared to
stand up for truth’s sake if he were asked to do so for a person who by
reason of biased evidence has been publicly defamed in such a manner
that it has given rise to the fear of becoming involved in the greatest
difficulties by confessing to a mere acquaintance with Rothaug. Because
Rothaug’s political power position has extensively been brought in,
in an attempt transparent to our eyes, to reduce the responsibility
of others, he feels pressed to clarify his real relationship to his
collaborators and the prosecutors within his sphere of work minutely
and in its totality in its official and personal aspect irrespective
of whether it concerns Rothaug’s official or unofficial statements,
his alleged relationship to Streicher, Holz, and Zimmermann; his
actual relationship to Haberkern, the “Blaue Traube” [Blue Grape],
the mysterious “Stammtisch;” his “TeNo-Rang” [rank in Teno[81]];
his attitude toward the judicial administration, his “recording
section” [Schallplattenbetrieb] in alleged spectacular proceedings;
or his representation of the devil on earth. In all these matters and
questions we have but one aim--To restore the truth in all its glory,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account