Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
If the trial shows that the defendant has committed an act which
deserves punishment according to the sound sentiment of the people, but
is not declared punishable by the law, the court will examine whether
the underlying principle of a penal law applies to the act and whether
justice can be helped to triumph by analogous application of that penal
law (Article 2 of the Penal Code).
Article 265, paragraph 1, applies accordingly.
* * * * * * *
4. Removal of one-sided limitations of the courts deciding on legal
appeals. The code of criminal procedure is amended as follows:
(a) Article 331 is amended as follows:
Article 331
Even if the judgment has been contested only by the defendant or his
legal representative or by the prosecution in his favor, it can be
changed against the interests of the defendant.
(b) Article 358, paragraph 2, is amended as follows:
Even if the judgment has been contested only by the defendant or his
legal representative or by the prosecution in his favor, it can be
changed against the interests of the defendant.
(c) Article 373, paragraph 2, is amended as follows:
Even if resumption of the proceedings has been applied for only by
the defendant or his legal representative or by the prosecution in
his favor, the sentence can be changed against the interest of the
defendant.
* * * * * * *
Section II
Exemption of the Reich Supreme Court from being bound by precedents.
The Reich Supreme Court as the highest German tribunal must consider
it its duty to effect an interpretation of the law which takes into
account the change of ideology and of legal concepts which the new
state has brought about. In order to enable it to accomplish this task
without having to show consideration for the jurisdiction of the past
brought about by other ideologies and other legal concepts, it is ruled
as follows:
When a decision is made on a legal question, the Reich Supreme Court
can deviate from a decision laid down before this law came into force.
* * * * * * *
Section IV
Freer Position of the Prosecution
1. Removal of the necessity of proceedings before the investigating
judge; Introduction of assistant judges.
The investigating code of criminal procedure is amended as follows:
(a) Article 178 is amended as follows:
Article 178
In those penal cases, which belong to the competency of the People’s
Court, the courts of appeal or the courts of assize, a preliminary
court investigation is to be held at the request of the prosecution, if
the prosecution, according to its own discretion, deems this necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account