Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
chiefs were either senior ministerial counsellors [Ministerialraete] or
Ministerialdirigenten.[115] Above them there were the department chiefs
[Abteilungsleiter], as a rule a ministerial director.[115] Sometimes it
was a Ministerialdirigent. Above them, but only temporarily, there was
an assistant under secretary [Unterstaatssekretaer]. Above him there
was one or several under secretaries [Staatssekretaeren].[115] At the
very top there was the Reich Minister.[115] When one keeps that survey
in mind, the answer to the question which counsel put to me becomes
fairly clear. The subdepartment chief was between the Referent and the
department chief. His task was to take reports from the Referent on
matters which were of a somewhat supernormal importance; matters which
were altogether normal and clear and unambiguous, where there were no
misgivings, no doubts, there the Referent made the decision. But as
soon as a matter, from any point of view, assumed somewhat greater
significance, he had to report on it to the chief who, in turn, had
to consider as to whether he himself was competent to decide on the
question. If it was of real significance, a report had to be made to
a higher authority, to the department chief, to the State Secretary,
and possibly to the Minister. In the absence of the department chief,
the subdepartment chief had to deputize for him in his business as
department chief. And the organization with us was such that every
subdepartment chief for his sphere of work had to undertake that work
as a deputy. In the big department IV, which has been discussed here
such a great deal, there were in the end six subdepartment chiefs,
each of whom had his own sphere of work. When the department chief
was absent, each one of the six subdepartment chiefs had to deputize
for the department chief within and for his own sphere of work. In
the main, my defense counsel has already explained the matter in his
opening statement, and I may therefore refer to it. As concerns myself
as a subdepartment chief, I too had to deputize for the department
chief when matters were concerned which belonged within my sphere of
work as a subdepartment chief.
2. EXTRACTS FROM THE “BASIC INFORMATION”
A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE COURT SYSTEM[116]
Following the practice of most continental nations, German law (based
primarily on Roman law principles) is largely enacted into codes. The
criminal code dates from 1871, and the code of criminal procedure from
1877.
Before Hitler’s seizure of power, the individual German states
(Laender) retained their sovereignty in the administration of justice
and the establishment of courts. There was, however, a Supreme Court of
the entire German Reich (Reichsgericht), which sat at Leipzig.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account