Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
(2) Applications for a reopening of the proceedings will be decided on
by the penal chamber of the district court at the seat of the Special
Court. The reopening of the case in favor of the defendant will take
place also if circumstances should make it necessary to re-examine
the case in ordinary proceedings. Article 363 of the code of criminal
procedure shall remain unaffected. If the application for reopening
is justified, the trial shall be directed to take place before the
competent ordinary court.
* * * * * * *
Part VI
Final Regulations
* * * * * * *
Article 40
Validity in the Protectorate
This decree is also valid for the German courts in the Protectorate of
Bohemia and Moravia.
* * * * * * *
Berlin, 21 February 1940
The Plenipotentiary for the Administration of the Reich
FRICK
PARTIAL TRANSLATION OF DOCUMENT NG-715
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 112
LETTER FROM UNDER SECRETARY FREISLER TO PRESIDENTS AND PUBLIC
PROSECUTORS AT COURTS OF APPEAL, 26 SEPTEMBER 1941, CONCERNING HANDLING
OF CERTAIN WARTIME CRIMES BY SPECIAL COURTS TO SPEED UP PROCEEDINGS
The Reich Minister of Justice
3234-III a4 1187
Berlin W 8, 26 September 1941
Wilhelmstrasse 65
Telephone: 11 00 44,
long distance: 11 65 16
To the Presidents and Public Prosecutors at the Courts of Appeal
and for the information of--
_a._ The President of the Reich Supreme Court
_b._ The Chief Reich Prosecutor of the Reich Supreme Court
concerning prosecution of wartime criminality--
Wartime crimes, particularly those involving the decree against public
enemies, the war economy decree, the decree against violent criminals,
and the decree against “Black Listening” [Listening to prohibited
broadcasts][127], should, as a matter of principle, be indicted before
Special Courts, in order to speed up proceedings as much as possible.
In the event that, because of the great number of proceedings, the
necessary rapid handling of such cases should not prove possible, I
wish to be informed promptly, in order that I may have new Special
Courts established or new senates added to already existing Special
Courts. The overload of work on a Special Court should never result in
the handing over of cases to other courts.
A Special Court is, as a rule, to be considered overloaded if a monthly
average of more than 40 new indictments has been filed with it.
Acting for the Minister
[Signed] DR. FREISLER
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account