Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
The cabinet assumed responsibility [for all orders and directives
issued by the Reich President] to the Reichstag by countersigning
them, and the Reichstag could react rather disagreeably; the cabinet,
if the Reich President and the Reichstag were of different opinions,
was forced to make a decision. If the cabinet took the opinion of the
Reichstag, then the Reich President either had to give in or change
the cabinet; if the cabinet went along with the President, then
nothing else was left than to risk the vote of lack of confidence; an
essential vote of the Reichstag could lead, therefore, to a struggle
of that kind, and in German practice the cabinet which went with the
president against the Reichstag was called a “fighting government”
[Kampfregierung]; not the other way around. In the long run it showed
that the Reich President, when the Chancellor went with him, was
stronger than the Reichstag. That also I may be permitted to describe
briefly. If the Reichstag did not agree with the president, was not
satisfied with the president’s decisions, it could not, properly
speaking, do anything. Even though the constitution in article 43[150]
reserved to the Reichstag the right to ask the people of the Reich
that they demand the resignation or the dismissal of the president.
That, in practice, never occurred, and for a very simple reason. If
the Reichstag would have come to a decision of that kind, and the
people would not have gone along, then that president would have been
automatically reelected for another 7 years, and also, the Reichstag
would have been dissolved, and that would mean suicide [for the
Reichstag]. However, the president is in a much better position; if
he is in agreement with the Chancellor, he can dissolve the Reichstag
himself. That is where the famous red folder comes in.[151] If,
therefore, the president and the cabinet are in agreement, and there is
a threat of censure on the part of the Reichstag, then the president
can turn over to the Reich Chancellor the order for dissolution [of the
Reichstag]. The Reich Chancellor is present in the session, and when
it comes to the last, he just shows that red folder and that settles
the entire matter. Now, the Tribunal will certainly understand why in
discussing article 48, paragraph 2, I did not even read paragraph
3,[152] because there it is expressed that the Reich President has to
notify the Reichstag of every dictatorial measure and if the Reichstag
wants it withdrawn, and the demands are made of the president, the
president has to repeal his measures. If he and the cabinet do not wish
to do that, they have the possibility of dissolving the Reichstag, and
that brings me back to what I pointed out before. Maybe one cannot
understand why the Reichstag permitted itself to be dispossessed, as
far as legislation is concerned. It would have had to be made entirely
different to be in a position to oppose due to the fact that the major
change could not depend upon them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account