Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. In 1933 I was approached on the subject of joining the NSDAP; I
refused. My reason was, first the fact that I could not subscribe to
the program of the NSDAP. Furthermore, another reason was my view
that Under Secretary of justice should remain neutral even on the
surface and, therefore, must not be obliged to any parties. I was
never a National Socialist. It is obvious that a party program, in its
manifold aspects, has many a point which one can adopt; for example,
the program’s aim of bridging class differences, that is to say, the
creation of a true national community; that point I welcomed heartily,
but, concerning the program of the NSDAP as a whole above all, the way
in which it was to be put into effect, that was far removed from my own
ideas. My own conservative attitude as a human being and as a jurist
accounted for that. It came as a great surprise to me when, on 30
January 1938, the Fuehrer’s Chancellery informed me in a letter, signed
by Bouhler, that Hitler had ordered that I was to join and be accepted
by the NSDAP. I said that that came as a great surprise to me. I
myself, like other Under Secretaries who had also come from the middle
classes, had never heard of that order, and it was impossible to refuse
because that would not merely have meant I would have given battle not
only to the Party, but the State itself. But I never departed from
that view. The membership which was ordered against my will and forced
upon me, I never made use of. I never attended a Party conference or
meeting. Naturally, I did not hold any office in the Party either.
Perhaps the fact that I never changed my attitude is also demonstrated
by the fact that neither my wife nor my sons ever belonged to the
Party. My social contacts, too, as far as they were not conditioned
by official affairs, moved almost exclusively within the circles of
non-Party members.
Q. The Hitler order by which Schlegelberger’s membership in the Party
was decreed will be submitted by me as Schlegelberger Document 34,
Schlegelberger Exhibit 92,[158] as soon as the document books shall
have been completed.
Witness, what effect did that attitude of yours have on your official
position?
A. I always saw to it that Party members and Party functionaries were
treated just like every other citizen. That played a part particularly
in personnel matters. I only appointed that person to an office who, in
my view, was properly qualified; and I refused to reward Party stars by
appointing them to an office.
On the other hand, the attitude of the Party toward the Ministry and
myself--and I shall have to come back to that later on--made great
difficulties and brought about many inner conflicts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account