Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. Bormann’s work extended, above all, to personnel policy. Under
the existing provisions, no ministry could appoint an official or
promote him against the opposition of the Party Chancellery. The Reich
Ministry of Justice always made its selection entirely on the basis
of professional qualifications. Bormann, on the other hand, attached
importance exclusively to the political opinion and the merits for
the Party. If he objected to a suggestion made by the Ministry of
Justice, and it was not possible to overcome the opposition, there was
nothing else to be done at first, but to wait for a better situation
perhaps, and leave the position unfilled. I experienced it myself that
the position of a president of a district court of appeal remained
vacant for that reason for more than a year. But it is obvious that the
possibilities of such action had a certain limit. It was inadvisable
to leave an unlimited number of positions vacant. And sometimes one
was forced to appoint to the administration of justice personnel of
only moderate qualifications, whereas persons who were better qualified
were left out. Bormann knew very well how to promote Hitler’s antipathy
for the administration of justice on the one hand, and on the other
hand how to exploit the naturally weak and unpolitical position of
the Ministry under Hitler. Hitler continuously received newspaper
clippings about court proceedings and sentences. Usually, the facts
were distorted, or the reports, in any case, were always inadequate.
Hitler was always approached on these subjects only at a moment when
for some other reason he was disgruntled and his attention had to be
distracted. Those reasons very often resulted from the war situation.
For Bormann, the administration of justice was the lightning conductor.
The Gauleiters cooperated with him. They collected the material with
great glee by getting newspaper clippings from provincial newspapers.
The Gauleiter of Munich [Gau Munich-Upper Bavaria], Wagner, excelled.
Every opportunity was used to discredit the administration of justice
before Hitler with entirely inadequate documentation. The key to that
situation lies in a statement which Goering made to me at the time the
administration of justice became centralized.[162] I will revert to
that later. Therefore, our main endeavor had to be to inform Hitler at
the earliest possible moment, and, of course, completely and honestly.
I shall have an opportunity to explain how those attempts were
constantly sabotaged by Bormann.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account