Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. Well, the witness Behl once characterized Freisler as the
representative of the Party interests in the Ministry of Justice. That
was correct. His career was the following: Freisler was a prisoner of
war in Russia during the First World War. After the end of the war
he remained in Russia for a considerable period of time. About his
activities during that period of time in Russia, a veil has never
been completely lifted. After he returned, he became an attorney at
Kassel, mainly acting as defense counsel for National Socialists. When
the Prussian Ministry of Justice was put in the hands of Minister
Kerrl, the latter called the old Party member, Freisler, to the post
of Under Secretary. He remained there until in 1934, on the occasion
of the merger of both offices in 1934, he was transferred to the
Reich Ministry of Justice. Freisler no doubt possessed a high degree
of intelligence, but quite apparently he was of abnormal spiritual
inclinations that ranged from extreme brutality all the way to a rather
feminine weakness. After he had insulted his assistants in the worst
possible manner without any reason, it would occur that soon after he
came to them to ask for their forgiveness in a very servile manner.
The Tribunal has actually made the acquaintance of Freisler optically
and acoustically.[175] He was quite well informed about problems of
criminal law, but he lacked any continuity and seriousness in his work.
He was restless and imbued with a lust for power, always looking for
new tasks and new problems. He was an old Party member, and he had the
Golden Party Badge, but he represented that type of National Socialist
who again and again fearfully vied for the favor of Hitler. Hitler
definitely recognized him as a one hundred percent National Socialist,
but personally did not think as much of him as Freisler would have
liked. Therefrom, and from his task to supervise the Ministry from
the National Socialist point of view, and from his indisputable
intelligence and his expert knowledge in the field of criminal law, the
dangerous qualities in his personality could be seen. He knew where
he had to start in order to achieve his goals. To work with him was
extremely difficult, and I may well say here that Freisler was the one,
after all, who undermined the work and the strength of Guertner and
contributed to his early death. And so, as far as I was concerned, my
continuous attempts to restrict Freisler made it extremely difficult
for me in my position. He did not stick to decisions which we had
made in long debates. He made secret promises to the [Nazi] Party
which, after they became apparent, restricted the Minister in his
possibilities of action.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account