Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
Before the outbreak of war, the main objective of Nazi penal
innovations was to suppress internal opposition to the new regime, and
to render life intolerable for the Jews. During the early years of
the war, the Nazi jurists were largely concerned with legal problems
incident to the occupation of Poland, France, and the other nations
overrun by the Wehrmacht. The extension of German law to the occupied
areas, and the outrages committed thereunder, constituted war crimes
and crimes against humanity on a grand scale, which will be described
in due course. German criminal law was also applied extensively to acts
committed outside the Reich, even when committed by foreigners.[29]
Acts committed by a foreigner outside the Reich could even constitute
treason against the Reich.
But the war also brought a mass of new criminal legislation within
Germany. This new legislation was influenced by the necessities of war,
but also contained matured concepts of National Socialist criminal
policy. The principal aim was to guarantee the security of the Nazi
regime, and bolster the economic and military strength of Germany,
through extremely harsh criminal punishments. The chief weapon was the
unsparing and almost indiscriminate use of capital punishment.
Later on, as Germany’s military situation worsened, the death penalty
became an ordinary sentence for a great variety of offenses. The
increased severity of air raids resulted in capital punishment or
long prison sentences for crimes committed during black-outs, even
very minor looting. Economic hardship and shortages of materials were
accompanied by laws prescribing penal servitude, or even death, for
anyone who destroyed or removed food or other supplies. Toward the
end of the war, a desperate attempt was made to cope with the growing
defeatism by imposing the death penalty for spreading rumors, listening
to foreign broadcasts and even for the most minor derogatory remarks
about the Hitler regime or pessimism concerning Germany’s chances of
military success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account