Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIIVarious
History
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume III
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
“There can be no doubt in this present state of war, when the
German nation wages its fight for its very existence, that
the Fuehrer must exercise the right, which he claims, to do
everything which serves or helps to achieve victory. Therefore,
the Fuehrer, by his authority as the leader of the nation,
supreme commander of the armed forces, head of the government,
and in supreme possession of all executive power, as supreme
law lord, and as leader of the Party, has to be in a position
to enforce, with all means which he may consider suitable,
every German’s duties, whether he might be a common soldier or
an officer, a subordinate or high civil servant or a judge, a
leading or subordinate functionary of the Party, a worker or an
employee. In case of violations of duties, he has the right to
impose the proper penance, after a conscientious examination
of the case. This can be done without consideration for the
so-called civil service rights. In particular, he may remove
anyone from his office, rank and his position, without resort to
the established procedures.”[35]
This menacing blast from the Fuehrer, and the resolution of the
Reichstag, wiped away the last remains of judicial independence in
Germany. Furthermore, within a few months a complete reorganization of
the upper levels of the Ministry of Justice took place. Schlegelberger,
who had seen the storm coming and made desperate efforts to meet
Hitler’s wishes, was nevertheless retired and replaced by Thierack.
A special Hitler decree in August 1942 gave the new Reich Minister
sweeping powers to bring the administration of justice into conformity
with the needs of the regime; it read:
“A strong administration of justice is necessary for the
fulfillment of the tasks of the Greater German Reich. Therefore,
I commission and empower the Reich Minister of Justice to
establish a National Socialist Administration of Justice, and
to take all necessary measures in accordance with the Reich
Minister and Chief of the Reich Chancellery and the Leader of
the Party Chancellery. He can hereby deviate from any existing
law.”[36]
At the same time, Roland Freisler left the Justice Ministry to become
president of the People’s Court, and the defendant Rothenberger
took Freisler’s old job as under secretary. Earlier in the year,
Rothenberger, previously president of the district court of appeals at
Hamburg, had attracted the Fuehrer’s attention by submitting to him a
long thesis on “judicial reform.” This thesis is a curious document;
it speaks at length of the honor and dignity of the judges’ function
and of the need for justice as the foundation of the Third Reich, but
the reason it won the Fuehrer’s approval can perhaps be more clearly
inferred from the two following quotations (_NG-075, Pros. Ex.
27_):
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account