Tribal Custom in Anglo-Saxon Law: Being an Essay Supplemental to (1) 'The English Village Community', (2) 'The Tribal System in Wales'Seebohm, Frederic
History
Tribal Custom in Anglo-Saxon Law: Being an Essay Supplemental to (1) 'The English Village Community', (2) 'The Tribal System in Wales'
Seebohm, Frederic
Anglo-Saxons; Law, Anglo-Saxon; Law, Medieval; Tribes -- Great Britain
_ANGLO-SAXON CUSTOM FROM THE NORMAN POINT OF VIEW._
I. ANGLO-SAXON CUSTOM AS APPLIED TO NORMANS.
[Sidenote: The Kentish laws to be treated apart.]
In approaching the question of Anglo-Saxon tribal custom it is needful to
make a clear distinction between the laws of the Kentish kings and the
other Anglo-Saxon laws.
The laws of the Kentish kings are known only in the MS.--the Textus
Roffensis--compiled or collected by Ernulf, Bishop of Rochester from 1115
to 1125, and are not included in the other collections containing the
laws of King Alfred and Ine.
The evidence for Kentish custom seems, therefore, to be independent
of that of Wessex or Mercia or Northumbria. Further, in the so-called
‘Laws of Henry I.’ at the conclusion of the statement of the customs as
to homicide in s. LXXVI. it is distinctly stated that the wergelds in
Kent differed much from those of Wessex both as regards _villani_ and
_barones_.
It will therefore be necessary to examine the Kentish laws separately
from the others.
[Sidenote: Laws of Henry I.]
On the whole, with regard to the others, it seems best to resort to the
method of proceeding from the later to the earlier evidence and to begin
with the so-called ‘Laws of Henry I.,’ as a Norman though unofficial
view of what Anglo-Saxon custom was or had been before the Conquest.
[Sidenote: When a Norman was killed.]
It may be well to inquire first, what in the view of the writer took
place, after the Conquest, when a Norman or stranger was killed, because
this at once raises the question what should happen in the unavoidable
absence of kindred.
Si Francigena qui parentes non habeat in murdro perimatur, habeat
precium natalis ejus qui murdrum abarnaverit: Rex de hundreto
ubi invenietur xl marc̄ argenti; nisi intra vii dies reddatur
malefactor justicie regis, et talis de quo possit justicia fieri.…
(lxxv. 6) If a Norman (_Francigena_) be murdered who has no
_parentes_, let that person have the price of his birth who made
known the murder. The King to have 40 marks of silver from the
hundred where he was found unless within 7 days the malefactor
be delivered up to the justice of the King in such a way that
justice can be had of him.…
Ad patrem vero, non ad matrem, generacionis consideracio
dirigatur: omnibus enim Francigenis et alienigenis debet esse rex
pro cognacione et advocato, si penitus alium non habeat.
(7) Consideration as to birth must be directed to the father, not
to the mother, for the King ought to be in the place of maternal
kindred (_cognatio_) and of advocate for the Norman or stranger
if he absolutely have no other.
Si ex parte patris parentes non habeat qui occiditur, et ex parte
matris habeat, quantum ad eum attinet, i. tercia pars weregildi
sui reddatur.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account