Trimblerigg : $b A book of revelationHousman, Laurence
Religion
Trimblerigg : $b A book of revelation
Housman, Laurence
Clergy -- Fiction; Romans à clef; Satire
The book he had chosen was of poems by an author whom he felt that he
ought to admire more than he did; there was a splendour of beauty in
them which yet managed somehow to escape him. This slight intellectual
separation of mind from mind was good as a sedative: it helped his own
to wander. His first selection from the poems was a very famous one,
but too spiritual and elusive for his present mood: a transcendental
game of hide-and-seek, he could not quite follow. He passed on to the
next; large drops of sleep were already entering his brain, and he
knew that presently it would be making nonsense; but the opening lines
attracted him, gave him a picture of which he himself became a part. In
the middle of every line there was a star--why, he did not know; but it
gave an effect. He liked it, and making an effort to keep awake for a
few moments longer, he read on:
‘Athwart the sod which is treading for God* the poet paced with his
splendid eyes;
‘Isabel Starling he stately passes--’
No, that wasn’t right; Sparling, not Starling. No, no, what was he
thinking about? Not Sparling, or Starling, or anything resembling it.
‘Paradise verdure he stately passes.’ That was better. The following
line had long words in it which he didn’t understand. The next verse
started pleasantly--
‘The angels at play on its fields of Summer* (their wild wings rustled
his guide’s cigars).’ No, not cigars, something else, word he didn’t
know: cigars would do.
‘Looked up from dessert at the passing comer* as they pelted each other
with handfuls of stars.’
Ah! That was why the stars were there, they’d got loose on to the
printed page: stars did, if you happened to get a knock or a fall.
‘And Isabel Sparling with startled feet rose,* hand on sword, by their
tethered cars.’
Wrong, wrong! not ‘Isabel Sparling’--‘warden spirits’: whatever made
him say Isabel Sparling? she wasn’t a warden spirit or anything like
one. But ‘tethered cars’ was right: ‘motor-bus’ would have been better.
After that his reading ceased to be consecutive or to convey any
sense--only colour and a sort of atmosphere. ‘Plumes night-tinctured,
englobed and cinctured,’ then a star, followed by ‘saints’:
‘crystalline pale,’ and another star: ‘Heaven’--ah, yes, Heaven, the
place the stars came from: then ‘the immutable crocean dawn’--crocean
meant yellow--‘enthusing’--no, not enthusing ‘effusing.’ ‘Crocean dawn
effusing’ meant ‘yellow dawn coming.’ If that was what he meant, why
couldn’t the fellow say so? Why did poets always choose the difficult
words? Ahead lay more light and colour, mixed with other things he
didn’t fully understand--or want to; he was getting too sleepy for it.
‘Bickering Conference’: no, not conference: ‘gonfalons’: better go
back and read again, he was only making nonsense; but ‘Crocean dawn
effusing’ was nonsense too. ‘Ribbed fire,’ ‘flame-plumed fan’--‘globing
clusters,’ and stars everywhere with no sense to them. But the poet had
splendid eyes--must have had, to see all that!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account