Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era: A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progressBoyd, James P. (James Penny)
History
Triumphs and Wonders of the 19th Century: The True Mirror of a Phenomenal Era: A volume of original, entertaining and instructive historic and descriptive writings, showing the many and marvellous achievements which distinguish an hundred years of material, intellectual, social and moral progress
Boyd, James P. (James Penny)
Inventions; Progress
The infantry of all the armies of Continental Europe, when deployed
for battle, was formed in three ranks. On the eve of the battle of
Leipsic, Napoleon, finding himself greatly outnumbered by the allies,
ordered his infantry to deploy in two ranks, in order that his front
might approximate in length to that of the enemy. This formation had,
however, been adopted by the British some years before, and had been
used with great success against the assaulting French columns, in many
of Wellington’s battles in Spain, where the steadfast Anglo-Saxon
soldiery was able to maintain the “thin red line,” and throw the
fire of every musket against the denser formation of its foes. It
was not until the British troops encountered, upon our own soil, an
Anglo-Saxon opponent as steadfast as themselves, and better skilled
in marksmanship, that they were unable to achieve a victory over
their enemies. True, our raw militia was everywhere beaten when it
encountered the disciplined soldiers of Great Britain, but our regular
troops at Chippewa and Lundy’s Lane gallantly defeated the choice
veterans of Wellington’s campaigns; and, at New Orleans, an army
composed mainly of hardy backwoodsmen, trained in Indian lighting, and
expert in the use of the rifle, hurled back, with frightful carnage,
experienced British soldiers who had habitually triumphed over the best
veterans of the French empire.
The battle of New Orleans marked the introduction of the rifle as a
formidable arm for infantry. It was by no means a new weapon, for it
had been invented in Germany in 1498; but it had not been used to any
extent in military service, mainly because of the slowness of loading.
The capabilities of the rifle in the hands of an army of expert
marksmen were, however, made so manifest by Jackson’s great victory
that the attention of military men was turned towards the weapon which
had enabled a crude army to overwhelm the choicest troops of Europe.
[Illustration: MINIÉ BALL.]
Yet it was not until 1850 that a practically efficient military rifle
appeared. This was the invention of Captain Minié, of the French army,
and was the well-known “Minié rifle,” long familiar to troops on both
continents. The weapon was a muzzle-loader, and its projectile, the
“Minié ball,” was of a conoidal shape, as shown in the accompanying
figure. The ball being slightly smaller in diameter than the bore of
the piece, the loading was easily accomplished, and the shock of the
explosion against the cavity at the base of the bullet forced the lead
into the grooves of the bore and caused the shot to take up a rotary
motion on its axis—in other words, “to take the rifling.”
Rifles, mostly constructed on principles similar to those on which
Minié’s weapon was based, were soon in use in the armies of all great
nations. The rifle musket, “model of 1855,” adopted by the United
States, is shown in the accompanying figure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account