Trooper Bluegum at the Dardanelles: Descriptive Narratives of the More Desperate Engagements on the Gallipoli PeninsulaHogue, Oliver
History
Trooper Bluegum at the Dardanelles: Descriptive Narratives of the More Desperate Engagements on the Gallipoli Peninsula
Hogue, Oliver
World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Turkey -- Gallipoli Peninsula; World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives, Australian
Then came talk of evacuation. It staggered us. In the House of Commons
and in the Press columns were devoted to discussing the Dardanelles
question and evacuation was freely recommended. The Australians rose
in wrath and exclaimed, "_We're d----d if we'll evacuate. We are going
to see this game through_." It was unthinkable that, having put our
hands to the plough, we could turn back. The Turks and their German
masters were kept well informed of the discussions at home and it made
them tremendously cocky. England had practically admitted failure. The
great Dardanelles expedition--the greatest crusade in the world--was an
admitted fiasco. Then the Turks reasoned together. And they agreed that
even "the fool English" would never talk so much about evacuation if it
were even remotely likely. But it was worth an army corps to Abdul, and
it did not make General Birdwood's task any easier.
Then Kitchener came. Many of us had seen him in Australia and South
Africa. We had confidence that he would see the thing through. He
landed on the beach and soon the word buzzed through the dug-outs,
up the gully, and along the firing line. "K. of K." was on Anzac and
the boys off duty congregated to give him a rousing welcome. He went
round the Anzac defences with General Birdwood, saw everything and then
started in to weigh the pros and cons of a knotty problem.
Ever since the day of landing, we had discussed in an offhand way
the possibility of "getting out." Not that we had ever considered
it remotely possible that we should ever turn back. But just as a
strategical and tactical exercise, we had figured out how it might be
done. And it seemed that the job of getting out was fraught with more
potentialities of disaster than the job of getting in. The landing
on April 25 was responsible for some slaughter. The evacuation, we
reckoned, would be carnage. At a most moderate computation 25 per
cent. of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps would have to be
sacrificed to ensure the safe withdrawal of the remainder. But of
course this was only a theoretical exercise. It was really outside the
sphere of practical politics.
Then like a bomb came word that in very surety we were going to
evacuate. In the House of Commons members had asked in an airy way why
the troops were not withdrawn from Suvla and Anzac. To them, in their
ignorance, it was merely a matter of embarking again and returning to
Egypt or Salonica or France. So simple it seemed to those armchair
strategists. They did not know that the beach at Anzac, our main
depôts, and our headquarters were within a thousand yards of the main
Turkish line; that the beach had been constantly shelled by "Beachy
Bill" and other batteries for eight solid months on end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account