Aboriginal Australians -- Government relations; Dunk Island (Qld.); Natural history -- Australia -- Queensland
Hitherto the food of the adder had been deemed to be frogs, lizards,
beetles, and such game of the ground. Was it curiosity which brought
the sun-loving bird within reach of the shade-loving snake? Upon the
incident being referred to Mr. Dudley Le Souef, who has quite an uneasy
familiarity with Australian snakes, dating from the days of ardent
youth, when he was wont to carry some species about with him in his
pockets, that authority wrote: “I did not know that death adders ever
killed birds; I did not think they were active enough, their usual
prey being frogs, lizards, etc. The honey-eater must have been taken
unawares.”
Though scientifically regarded as “the most dangerous and probably the
most deadly” of Australian snakes, the death adder has to its credit
many everyday proofs to the contrary: so many, indeed, that some are
inclined to class it as comparatively harmless, the reasons for such
opinion being--(1) the small size of the creature, reducing the risks
of its being interfered with inadvertently; (2) its amiability; (3) the
fact that unless the sensitive membrane at the end of the tail, to which
the curved spine is the culminating-point, is trodden on or otherwise
insulted, the chances are that there will be, no active resentment.
While adopting all precautions, accepting no risks, and being very eager
to reduce the number by all and every possible means, it is well to
avoid overexcitement; for though the reptilian age is passing away,
those who live in the bush are too often reminded that snakes are still
numerous, and some of them decidedly vicious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account