True Stories of the Great War, Volume 2 (of 6): Tales of Adventure--Heroic Deeds--Exploits Told by the Soldiers, Officers, Nurses, Diplomats, Eye Witnesses
History
True Stories of the Great War, Volume 2 (of 6): Tales of Adventure--Heroic Deeds--Exploits Told by the Soldiers, Officers, Nurses, Diplomats, Eye Witnesses
World War, 1914-1918 -- Personal narratives
The Spanish Minister and I tried to prevail upon Lancken to call Great
Headquarters, at Charleville, on the telephone and have the case laid
before the Emperor for his decision. Lancken stiffened perceptibly
at this suggestion and refused, frankly--saying that he could not do
anything of the sort. Turning to Villalobar, he said, "I can't do that
sort of thing. I am not a friend of my sovereign as you are of yours,"
to which a rejoinder was made that in order to be a good friend one
must be loyal and ready to incur displeasure in case of need. However,
our arguments along this line came to the point of saying that the
military governor of Brussels was the supreme authority (Gerichtsherr)
in matters of this sort, and that even the Governor General had no
power to intervene. After further argument he agreed to get General von
Sauberschweig, the military governor, out of bed to learn whether he
had already ratified the sentence and whether there was any chance for
clemency.
Lancken was gone about half an hour, during which time the three of us
labored with Harrach and Falkenhausen, without, I am sorry to say, the
slightest success. When Lancken returned he reported that the military
governor had acted in this case only after mature deliberation; that
the circumstances of Miss Cavell's offence were of such a character
that he considered infliction of the death penalty imperative. Lancken
further explained that under the provisions of German military law
the Gerichtsherr had discretionary power to accept or to refuse
to accept an appeal for clemency; that in this case the Governor
regretted that he must decline to accept the appeal for clemency or any
representations in regard to the matter.
We then brought up again the question of having the Emperor called on
the telephone, but Lancken replied very definitely that the matter
had gone too far; that the sentence had been ratified by the military
governor, and that when matters had gone that far "even the Emperor
himself could not intervene." (Although accepted at the time as true,
this statement was later found to be entirely false and is understood
to have displeased the Emperor. The Emperor could have stopped the
execution at any moment.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account