Those who have read the history of the first Thames tunnel will recall
the early unsuccessful attempts at construction which had discouraged
English engineers. Five years after Brunel’s patent was secured a
company was formed to undertake the task again, the plan being to use
the shield system, under the personal direction of its inventor as chief
engineer. For this work Brunel selected the cellular shield mentioned as
an alternative construction in his original patent. He also chose to
make this shield rectangular in form. This choice is commonly accounted
for by the fact that the strata to be penetrated by the tunnel were
practically horizontal, and that it was assumed by the engineer that a
rectangular shield would for some reason best resist the pressures which
would be developed. Whatever the reason may have been for the choice,
the fact remains that a rectangular shield was adopted. The tunnel as
designed consisted of two parallel horseshoe tunnels, 13 ft. 9 ins. wide
and 16 ft. 4 ins. high and 1200 ft. long, separated from each other by a
wall 4 ft. thick, pierced by 64 arched openings of 4 ft. span, the whole
being surrounded with massive brickwork built to a rectangular section
measuring over all 38 ft. wide and 22 ft. high.
The first shield designed by Brunel for the work proved inadequate to
resist the pressures, and it was replaced by another somewhat larger
shield of substantially the same design, but of improved construction.
This last shield was 22 ft. 3 ins. high and 37 ft. 6 ins. wide. It was
divided vertically into twelve separate cast-iron frames placed close
side by side, and each frame was divided horizontally into three cells
capable of separate movement, but connected by a peculiar articulated
construction, which is indicated in a general way by Fig. 124. To close
or cover the face of the excavation, poling-boards held in place by
numerous small screw-jacks were employed. Each cell or each frame could
be advanced independently of the others, the power for this operation
being obtained by means of screw-jacks abutting against the completed
masonry lining. Briefly described, the mode of procedure was to remove
the poling-boards in front of the top cell of one frame, and excavate
the material ahead for about 6 ins. This being done, the top cell was
advanced 6 ins. by means of the screw-jacks, and the poling-boards were
replaced. The middle cell of the frame was then advanced 6 ins. by
repeating the same process, and finally the operation was duplicated for
the bottom cell. With the advance of the bottom cell one frame had been
pushed ahead 6 ins., and by a succession of such operations the other
eleven frames were advanced a distance of 6 ins., one after the other,
until the whole shield occupied a position 6 ins. in advance of that at
which work was begun. The next step was to fill the 6-in. space behind
the shield with a ring of brickwork.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account