The average progress per working-day was 30 ft. of side wall, or about
45 cu. yds.; and the average cost, including all work required in
removing the timber work, train service, lights and tools, engineering
and superintendence, and interest on plant, was $8 per cubic yard.
[Illustration: FIG. 165.--Centering Mullan Tunnel.]
The centering used for putting in the brick arches is shown in Fig. 165.
From 3 ft. to 9 ft. of arch was put in at a time, the length depending
upon the nature of the ground. To remove the old timber arch, one of the
segments was partly sawed through; and then a small charge of giant
powder was exploded in it, the resulting débris, cordwood, rock, etc.,
being caught by a platform car extending underneath. From this car the
débris was removed to another car, which conveyed it out of the tunnel.
The center was then placed and the brickwork begun, the cement car shown
in Fig. 164 being used for mixing the mortar. The size of the bricks
used was 2¹⁄₂ + 2¹⁄₂ + 9 ins., four rings making a 20-in. arch and
giving 1.62 cu. yds. of masonry in the arch per lin. ft. of tunnel. The
bricks were laid in rowlock bond, two gangs, of three bricklayers and
six helpers each, laying about 12 lin. ft. per day. The brickwork cost
about $17 per cu. yd. The total cost of the new lining averaged about
$50 per lin. ft.
[Illustration: ~Cross Section.~
~Longitudinal Section.~
FIG. 166.--Relining Timber-Lined Tunnel, Norfolk and Western Ry.]
=Little Tom Tunnel.=--The tunnel has a total length of 1,902 ft., but
only 1,410 ft. of it were originally lined with timber. This old timber
lining consists of bents spaced 3 ft. apart, and located as shown by the
dotted lines in the cross-section, Fig. 166. Instead of renewing this
timber, it was decided to replace it with a brick lining. Although the
tunnel was constructed through rock, this rock is of a seamy
character, and in some portions of the tunnel it disintegrates on
exposure to the air. In removing the timber to make place for the new
lining some of the roof was found close to the lagging, but often also
considerable sections showed breakages in the roof extending to a height
varying from 1 ft. to 12 ft. above the upper side of the timbering. This
dangerous condition of the roof made it necessary that only a small
section of the timber lining should be removed at one time. It made it
necessary, also, that the brick arch should be built quickly to close
this opening, and finally that all details of centers, etc., should be
arranged so as to furnish ample clearance to trains. The accompanying
illustrations show the solution of the problem which was arrived at.
[Illustration: FIG. 167.--Relining Timber-Lined Tunnel, Norfolk and
Western Ry.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account