There were other ardent French nationalists who felt very much the same
way about it. However, in their opinion, it would be unwise to gamble
on the complete absorption of Germany in her _Bagdadbahn_. It would be
wiser, perhaps, to withhold financial support until such time as the
German Foreign Office was willing to execute a formal treaty conferring
upon France an exclusive sphere of interest in Morocco. Bagdad was to
be had for the asking—but in exchange for Morocco! It is said that
in 1905, after the fall of Delcassé and on the eve of the Algeciras
Conference, M. Rouvier, Prime Minister of France, approached the
German ambassador in Paris with a view to negotiating a Franco-German
agreement granting Germany a free hand in Turkey in return for
recognition of the special interests of France in Morocco.[40]
M. André Tardieu revived this suggestion two years later. “Germany
needs capital,” he said. “And when one needs capital, it is to France
that one comes in search of it. It is inevitable, necessary, therefore,
that Germany come to us. She will be obliged to come to us sooner or
later to seek our capital for the Bagdad enterprise. Germany has the
concession. She has commenced the lines. But all the sections requiring
the greatest engineering skill are still to be constructed, and she
has not the money to construct them.” If France agrees to let Germany
have the necessary funds, it will be on the condition that Germany
allow France important compensations. “Where will these compensations
be sought? I have no hesitation in saying, in Morocco. The Act of
Algeciras must be set aside, and France must have a free hand in
Morocco! An agreement upon the Bagdad question would be mischievous if
it concerned Bagdad alone, for, the Germans having the concession in
their pockets, the positions of the negotiators would not be equal. On
the other hand, if the agreement is for two purposes, if it refers to
Bagdad _and_ Morocco, I believe, I repeat, it would be both practicable
and desirable.”[41]
The proposal that French consent to the Bagdad Railway could be
purchased with compensations in North Africa met with no enthusiasm
in Germany. Herr Bassermann, leader of the National Liberals in the
Reichstag, urged the Foreign Office to meet any such diplomatic
maneuver on the part of France with a sharp rebuff.[42] At the time
of the Agadir crisis, furthermore, Baron Marschall von Bieberstein is
said to have warned Bethmann-Hollweg that Germany would have to stand
firm on Morocco, for “if, notwithstanding Damascus and Tangier, we
abandon Morocco, we lose at one blow our position in Turkey, and with
it the advantages and prospects for the future which we have acquired
painfully by years of toil.”[43]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account