Many of the charges brought against the Bagdad Railway by the British
shipping interests could not have been substantiated. As early as 1892,
Lord Curzon stated emphatically that, for most commercial purposes, a
trans-Mesopotamian railway would be next to valueless. “If I were a
stockholder in the P. & O. [the Peninsular and Oriental, one of the
Inchcape lines touching at Indian and Persian Gulf ports], I would
not,” he said, “except for the possible loss of the mails, be in the
least alarmed at the competition of such a railway.”[17] Informed
Germans, likewise, did not consider the Bagdad Railway a serious
competitor to the Suez Canal. One authority, for example, wrote: “The
Bagdad Railway taken as a whole is of importance only for through
passenger and postal traffic (in which respect, therefore, it is of
greatest value to the British in their communications with India) and
occasionally for fast freight. The great bulk of the freight traffic,
on the other hand, carrying the import and export trade of the East,
hardly can fall to the Bagdad Railway, which, for a long time at least,
must content itself with the local traffic of certain sections of the
line,” particularly in Cilicia, Syria, and northern Mesopotamia.[18]
The assertion that the cost of constructing and operating the line
would be borne by British commerce was based upon specious reasoning.
Higher customs duties would not be paid by the British merchant, but
by the Turkish consumer. The only harmful effect of the increased
duties would be a general increase of prices of imported commodities
in Turkey, leading, perhaps, to a lesser demand for foreign goods. It
was probable, on the other hand, that this slight disadvantage would be
more than offset by the wider prosperity which the Railway was almost
certain to bring the districts traversed. In any event, whatever burden
might be saddled upon the import trade would have to be borne, in
proportion to the volume of business transacted, by the competitors of
British merchants as well as by British merchants themselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account